User talk:Ssehic

Welcome!

Hello, Ssehic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Smartse (talk) 23:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you.

Your companies website [1] clearly states that you are a founder of the company. Smartse (talk) 23:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

Please be aware of the following discussion regarding your editing: [2] Thanks Smartse (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Armorlogic[edit]

A tag has been placed on Armorlogic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 17:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Armorlogic[edit]

I have nominated Armorlogic, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armorlogic. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bongo matic 07:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added some more references which contribute to the notability part - please have a look and let's discuss ssehic (talk) 09:36, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: List of web application firewalls[edit]

Hello. Thanks for your note. I do see that there's been at attempt at developing an article for Armorlogic. I notice that it didn't make it on the basis that the article was taken as mostly advertising. If this is correct then it seems that there weren't any third party references in that article that talked about or verified the notability of the firewall app. It's for these reasons that I would also suggest that we not list it in the Application firewall article. Dawnseeker2000 19:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've been busy. I can see this took some time to put together. I know I've spent hours building articles from scratch too. Well, on first look it appears to have what it would take to get into the main article space. But I don't want to mislead you. Again, I've done a number of these articles and have had them deleted right away. So I have learned the nuts and bolts of what it takes to make 'em stick.

The references are borderline. There really isn't any real authoritative names in the refs. I'm talking about computer industry names that even an average non-techie Wikipedia editor / administrator would recognize like PC magazine, PC World, ZDNet, and CNET Networks. Of course there' others too, but these are the types of publications or websites that are easily recognized.

Right now I'd say it's a toss up. I know that there are tons of other articles that have little or poor sourcing. I do tons of work on improving sources for articles and I am concerned that this one may get tagged again for deletion if it's put in the main space. You really don't have anything to lose, but again, I think that the article may not prove itself in terms of notability just based on the lack of real recognizable sources.

Dawnseeker2000 02:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Armorlogic logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Armorlogic logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files in your user space[edit]

Hey there Ssehic, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Ssehic/Armorlogic. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Armorlogic logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Armorlogic logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]