User talk:Stündle

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Stündle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Top Jim (talk) 06:56, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lavet type stepping motor[edit]

What a brilliant first article. Thank you! Top Jim (talk) 06:56, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but it's only my first article with this account :P. Anyway I'm not writing often in english and hope an expert also thinks my explanations are good and in correct terms. --Stündle (talk) 07:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Stündle. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Yunshui 雲‍水 08:41, 4 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Why the video?[edit]

Hey, could you justify this change you made to the precession article? The video file is 1.3 MiB as opposted to the 224 KiB of the GIF, and while in larger dimensions the video is just an interpolated upscaling of the GIF. Additionally, the GIF file has pixel-perfect compression (except for the colors limit), as opposed to the lossy compression of the video. I don't see any advantage on making that change. — LucasVB | Talk 21:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The data volume for the video is only generated if the visitor wants to see the animation. At this point I see no advantage for one or the other option. The major advantage of a video is, that it only starts if you want to and you can stop it as well, nothing you can do with a GIF. Thus you have no annoying moving thing in view while reading the article.

Best regards 93.213.164.95 (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]