User talk:StaceyGrove

Jedi in the United Kingdom[edit]

Hi, you recently reverted my edit to Religion in the United Kingdom, labelling it as vandalism. Can I suggest that you not be so quick to assume bad faith in other editors? The issue is actually discussed on the talk page, and if you feel that the material should remain, I'd be grateful if you could explain why there. It seems clear to me that the evidence from the census has to be disregarded due to the campaign distorting its results. Ilkali (talk) 20:12, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vavoom Records for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vavoom Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vavoom Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SITH (talk) 12:21, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]