User talk:Stacie Croquet

.sylvester Stallone part time lived in Philadelphia-

Stacie Croquet, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Stacie Croquet! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 21:20, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your common sense edit (link below), I award you an original barnstar. 50.193.171.69 (talk) 00:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is the edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tapestry_%28Carole_King_album%29&diff=next&oldid=611869003

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Old Wicked Songs may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''''Old Wicked Songs''''' is a two character play written by Jon Mara]] whose work received a nomination for the 1996 [[Pulitzer Prize]] in Drama. Other works by Marans

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Orquesta La 33 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

/ref> The collective was founded in [[Bogotá]] in 2002 by brothers Sergio and Santiago Mejía.<ref> [[Evening Chronicle (Newcastle-upon-Tyne), ''A Passion for the Keyboard'' 10 July 2009</ref> The name

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:01, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Salsa Kids may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Diane Warren]]'s ''Nadie nos va a detener'' (Nothing's Gonna Stop Us Now, Spanish Version)].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:18, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wayne Gorbea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wayne Gorbea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 17:34, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved it to User:Stacie Croquet/Wayne Gorbea so you can work on it and fix it before moving it back to the mainspace. GB fan 20:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of R Elliott (Newcastle United) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R Elliott (Newcastle United) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R Elliott (Newcastle United) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:15, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Hello, and thank you for editing on Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've recently made new redirect pages, such as Tan, Amy, Shute, Nevil and Nicholls, David. However, pages on Wikipedia are listed with the first name given first, such as John Smith, Jane Doe and Bob Jones. For more information on redirects, please look at the help page on redirects. If you need any more help, please refer to the help desk. Thank you. Aerospeed (Talk) 21:56, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, there is nothing wrong with those redirects. You can tag ones like them in the future with, {{R from sort name}}. GB fan 23:41, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: EDITWAR (your note on the TeaHouse )

Stacie,

I saw your note on the Teahouse. I looked at the page itself, and it doesn't appear that you're edit-warring, nor does it look like you're linkspamming. However, it does appear that you're attempting to link Glucocorticoid to one particular drug. That particular drug is a type of Glucocorticoid, but it is not the only Glucocorticoid. It would be akin to my editing the article on non-sugar sweeteners to contain only "Saccharine". Saccharine is definitely a non-sugar sweetener, but it's not the only one. Do you follow ? KoshVorlon Rassekali ternii i mlechnye puti 18:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with what KoshVorlon has written above. Technically the link to mometasone furoate is not link spam but when combined with a link to Glenmark Pharmaceuticals it is very close to link spam. Furthermore per WP:WINARS, Wikipedia itself is not a reliable source. Hence citing a Wikipedia article as a source as you did in this edit is not appropriate. Boghog (talk) 21:50, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya Guys, and thank you for your constructive comments. My original edit was based on two criteria. Firstly corticosteroid is more informative than Steroid hormone, indicating that Glucocorticoid is secreted by the adrenal cortex. The second criteria (now negated by the addition of Boghog's "better" reference) was that a referenced fact is better than an unreferenced fact. The source was the Package leaflet from a tube of Mometasone Furoate that I have. Glenfield are the manufacturer and hence the publisher for this source. The reference was never to another Wikipedia article. I thought linking Glengfield and MF would add clarity but clearly it did not. Stacie Croquet (talk) 22:21, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Birmingham pub bombings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Mick Murray (Irish republican).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mick Murray (Irish republican).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:14, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Stacie Croquet. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 15:12, 1 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 15:12, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Myasthenia & polymyositis

I am unsure why you added a newspaper article from 40 years ago to myasthenia gravis and polymyositis. I don't think a single event from 40 years ago is relevant, but please let me know if this was a particularly illustrative case that had a long-term impact on the public perception of either or both disorders. JFW | T@lk 23:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article from the Observer is from 1974. Since the time of publication, diagnosis has improved significantly. For myasthenia there is a number of immunological and electrophysiological tests, and the inflammatory myopathies too can be diagnosed with a lot more confidence. Still, diagnosis is not perfect and it is known from large studies that even conditions like Parkinson's are misdiagnosed in up to 10% (when comparing the symptoms in life with the findings on postmortem examination of the brain). Life would be rather a lot easier if all diagnosis was infallible.

I hope you understand that discussion of a single historical case of misdiagnosis is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article unless this particular case led to widespread changes in public or professional perception. If you dispute my view you could raise the matter on WT:MED. JFW | T@lk 08:08, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your message on my talk page: I am not too delighted with your accusation of me being "self-indulgent". It matters little whether the suitability of the source is tested on WT:MED or WP:RSN. I think I have given a pretty clear explanation as to why I think the source in question is of little relevance to readers. In resource-poor settings (which Canada isn't), diagnosis can still be achieved on clinical grounds (features on history and examination) but there is probably a slightly higher risk that the diagnosis is not secure. That is not unique to these conditions - in the absence of diagnostics it is possible to misdiagnose early viral haemorrhagic fever as malaria, etc. JFW | T@lk 13:51, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your further message on my talkpage. All medical articles employ roughly the same style (see WP:MEDMOS) that might occasionally make them sound like an undergraduate textbook. At the same time, we strive hard to make the content useful and comprehensible for everyone. What we try not to do is provide long lists of "differential diagnoses" for each medical problem, because that is definitely something unsuitable for an encyclopedia and more the domain of medical textbooks.

When I alluded to immunological tests I was referring to concepts that are widely discussed (antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor and the MuSK protein), and "electrophysiological tests" refers to nerve conduction studies.

When it comes to discussing misdiagnosis in the context of any medical article, we are bound by the availability of solid medical sources (ideally recent, peer-reviewed, secondary sources). Unfortunately this is not something that has been very well studied, and MG is no exception.

If you believe there is a pervasive problem with the medical content on Wikipedia I would strongly recommend you enunciate this on WT:MED so these concerns can be addressed by the medical editing community. I will stop now. JFW | T@lk 17:51, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hello, Stacie Croquet. You have new messages at John from Idegon's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

All content about living people must be sourced to reliable sources. Removing blp violations is not edit warring. This isn't Facebook. John from Idegon (talk) 04:59, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Iveco Eurocargo redirect

Hi, I have changed the redirect for the above to point to Iveco rather than Ford Cargo due to them being produced by two different manufacturers - Granted, the Ford Cargo was an Iveco product, but only because Iveco was part of Ford and not Fiat as it is now - where the Eurocargo comes in. Thanks aycliffe^talk 10:28, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Luftwaffe may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the history of the [[Third Reich]], the Luftwaffe had only two ''[[Reich Ministers for Aviation]]''). The first was [[Hermann Göring]], with the second and last being ''[[Generalfeldmarschall]]'' [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:52, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Enigma machine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M4. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BLP Sourcing.

Please note that WP:BLPPRIVACY and WP:BLPSOURCES are policy and you should familiarize yourself with them before adding information to BLP articles that rely solely on tabloid sources. Cheers GimliDotNet (talk) 18:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid warning

Can you please explain why you did this? It's perfectly obvious that I didn't violate 3RR. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule, then look into your soul Stacie Croquet (talk) 19:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to warn me about edit-warring -- after two reverts -- then you would be advised not to use a template that warns about the 3-revert-rule. And my soul is none of your business. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

02 Baker listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 02 Baker. Since you had some involvement with the 02 Baker redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Arderin" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Arderin". Since you had some involvement with the "Arderin" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]