User talk:Staplepuffs27
Welcome[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Staplepuffs27, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Staplepuffs27! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC) |
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Paid editing on Wikipedia[edit]
Hello Staplepuffs27. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Kai USA related articles Kershaw Knives, Shun Cutlery and Zero Tolerance Knives, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Staplepuffs27. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Staplepuffs27|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
.svg) | Staplepuffs27, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Kai USA for their contributions to Wikipedia. |
Sorry for the mistake. I should have read the Terms of Use more carefully. Please clean up pages as needed. Staplepuffs27 (talk) 22:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note, and for disclosing your relationship with Kai USA. So you have a COI for that company and related topics, as we define that in Wikipedia.
- After it is clear that you understand the "ground rules" here I will be happy to discuss the content you want to change, but first things first.
- To finish the disclosure piece, would you please add the disclosure to your user page (which is User:Staplepuffs27 - a redlink, because you haven't written anything there yet). Just something simple like: "I work for XC and have a conflict of interest with regard to that company and related topics" would be fine. If you want to add anything else there that is relevant to what you want to do in WP feel free to add it, but please don't add anything promotional about the company or yourself (see WP:USERPAGE for guidance if you like).
- I added a tag to the Shun, Zero Tolerance, and Kershaw articles' talk pages, so the disclosure is done there. Once you disclose on your user page, the disclosure piece of this will be done.
- As I noted above, there are two pieces to COI management in WP. The first is disclosure. The second is a form of peer review. This piece may seem a bit strange to you at first, but if you think about it, it will make sense. In Wikipedia, editors can immediately publish their work, with no intervening publisher or standard peer review -- you can just create an article, click save, and voilà there is a new article, and you can go into any article, make changes, click save, and done. No intermediary - no publisher, no "editors" as that term is used in the real world. So the bias that conflicted editors tend to have, can go right into the article. Conflicted editors are also really driven to try to make the article fit with their external interest. If they edit directly, this often leads to big battles with other editors.
- What we ask editors to do who have a COI or who are paid, and want to work on articles where their COI is relevant, is:
- a) if you want to create an article relevant to a COI you have, create the article as a draft through the WP:AFC process, disclose your COI on the Talk page with the Template:Connected contributor (paid) tag, and then submit the draft article for review (the AfC process sets up a nice big button for you to click when it is ready) so it can be reviewed before it publishes; and
- b) And if you want to change content in any existing article on a topic where you have a COI, we ask you to
- (i) disclose at the Talk page of the article with the Template:Connected contributor (paid) tag, putting it at the bottom of the beige box at the top of the page; and
- (ii) propose content on the Talk page for others to review and implement before it goes live, instead of doing it directly yourself. Just open a new section, put the proposed content there, and just below the header (at the top of the editing window) please the
{{request edit}}tag to flag it for other editors to review. In general it should be relatively short so that it is not too much review at once. Sometimes editors propose complete rewrites, providing a link to their sandbox for example. This is OK to do but please be aware that it is lot more for volunteers to process and will probably take longer.
- By following those "peer review" processes, editors with a COI can contribute where they have a COI, and the integrity of WP can be protected. We get some great contributions that way, when conflicted editors take the time to understand what kinds of proposals are OK under the content policies. (There are good faith paid editors here, who have signed and follow the Wikipedia:Statement on Wikipedia from participating communications firms, and there are "black hat" paid editors here who lie about what they do and really harm Wikipedia).
- But understanding the mission, and the policies and guidelines through which we realize the mission, is very important! There are a whole slew of policies and guidelines that govern content and behavior here in Wikipedia. Please see User:Jytdog/How (written by another volunteer colleague) for an overview of what Wikipedia is and is not (we are not a directory or a place to promote anything), and for an overview of the content and behavior policies and guidelines. Learning and following these is very important, and takes time. Please be aware that you have created a Wikipedia account, and this makes you a Wikipedian - you are obligated to pursue Wikipedia's mission first and foremost when you work here, and you are obligated to edit according to the policies and guidelines. Editing Wikipedia is a privilege that is freely offered to all, but the community restricts or completely takes that privilege away from people who will not edit and behave as Wikipedians. I hope that makes sense to you.
- I want to add here that per the WP:COI guideline, if you want to directly update simple, uncontroversial facts (for example, correcting the facts about where the company has offices) you can do that directly in the article, without making an edit request on the Talk page. Just be sure to always cite a reliable source for the information you change, and make sure it is simple, factual, uncontroversial content. If you are not sure if something is uncontroversial, please ask at the Talk page.
- Will you please agree to learn and follow the content and behavioral policies and guidelines, and to follow the peer review processes going forward when you want to work on the Kai USA-related articles or any article where your COI is relevant? Do let me know, and if anything above doesn't make sense I would be happy to discuss. Best regards ☆ Bri (talk) 03:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for your thorough response, Bri. I have reviewed the information you have provided. I think I have a better grasp on the rules and guidelines and am ready to move forward in a way that promotes transparency, accuracy, and ethics. I will also follow the peer review process and behavioral guidelines going forward. I have added a discloser to my user page per your request. Please let me know how you wish to proceed with the articles in question. I'll start off by saying that our main goals are to make sure the info is factual, to separate the brands, and to clarify our corporate structure as that has been confused for a long time. It is not our intent to be promotional. Staplepuffs27 (talk) 17:07, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Shun Cutlery Logo Small.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Shun Cutlery Logo Small.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
The page File:Zero Tolerance 0566BW Folding Knife.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image was an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links were updated.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:01, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
