User talk:Starling0616

File copyright problem with File:CarolTarra2004.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:CarolTarra2004.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NtheP (talk) 20:50, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Tarra- tire-store1974-300x206.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Tarra- tire-store1974-300x206.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 21:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photos[edit]

You can't keep adding the same photo without saying a) where you got it from and b) what the copyright status is. That's all you need to add to the photo and the problems go away. But without that information it will just get deleted each time you upload it. If it's a scan of a photo you took then you own the copyright and you just need to say so. If some one else owns the copyright then either their permisison is needed or a claim for fair but non free use has to be made. If you need a hand to do any of this just ask but please don't ignore the notice or you will keep feeling frustrated that the image is being deleted. NtheP (talk) 21:30, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:2004CarolTarra.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:2004CarolTarra.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please remove the tag.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please talk to us - we want to help[edit]

Starling, why have you tagged a section of your own work as a copyright violation? have you read the possible consequences of using copyrighted material? Also yet another photgraph is up for deletion due to licencing. If you would discuss/respond to some of the notices posted here we can help you to sort these issues out. Either leave a message here or on my talk page and things can be straightened out. NtheP (talk) 16:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first Article so I guess I am making all the newbee mistakes. 1. I have contacted the subject of this article and she sent me 3 images which have no copyright. She said they can be used freely. I want to use those three images instead of the image in question. Can I just upload the new images. Would you like me to send you the email she sent me? would you like her to email you directly?

2. Someone at Wikipedia has run a dupicator program on my article and come up with 7 occurances of copied code. I have fixed the first 2 incidences. The last 5 are as follows:

--"tilbury house publishers" Tilbury house publishers published two of Buckley's books. I have put the publisher in 'quotes'. Is that ok?

--"http www elephants com" is a url. I cannot find it in the text of what I wrote but it is a url.

--"around the world" while the phrase is insipid, I am not sure that anyone can be accused of originating or plagerizing the phrase. And my use of this insipid phrase is intirely different from the use of the phrase that appeared in a source.

--travels with tarra july aug 2002 I don't think I used this phrase in the article. Perhaps my sources used it but I cannot change what they write can I?

--and my favorite: "only roller skating elephant" I have changed the phrase to the "world's only elephant who can roller skate". I think that phrase is clumbsy. On the edge of bring obnoxious, I guess I could put only roller skating giraff, or only surfing elephant.

Thanks for doing this proofing. I know it is a very difficult job.

Starling

Starling, let's start with the image files, File:2004CarolTarra.jpg, is this a photo that you have explicit permission from Carol to use and have written or email confirmation of this? If so check it includes the information listed at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission then forward that email to "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org" Then add this code to the image file

{{Information | description = Carol Buckley with Tarra | source = http://www.carolbuckley.com/images/indexCarol.jpg | date = 2004 | author = Carol Buckley | permission = {{OTRS pending}} }}

What this achieves is a) indicating that permission to use the photo is being investigated and b) that you have sent the permission email through to the wikimedia foundation for verification. A volunteer will check the permission and if it is in order they will change the photo information to indicate that everything is ok.

I'll have a look at the text stuff later and get back to you. NtheP (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have placed the copyvio notice yourslef - who told you there were 7 instances of copied code. The website quoted in the notice i.e. http://www.forewordreviews.com/reviews/travels-with-tarra/ doesn't seem to bear much resemblance to what you wrote - same subject that's about it. If someone has told you there are copyright violations I think they are being a bit harsh - as you say there aren't that many ways you can write "world's only roller skating elephant". Perhaps it's something that a good copy edit can resolve. NtheP (talk) 18:53, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the duplication detector report [1] The problem is with the first phrase ("as Tara grew older ...")and the second one ("this would not be a zoo ..."). That entire paragraph is basically directly copied from the source. The other five hits can be ignored, you do not need to fix them. However, if there are any other sentences you have copied directly from other websites you also need to fix those. Yoenit (talk) 19:29, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nthep

I do not have express permission to use the file 2004CarolTarra.jpg. However I do have email permission - well she sent me the file, Carol with Jenny and Shirley high res.jpg which I did upload. I will upload the other 2 images and then send the email to the Wikipeople with the specifications you outlined above.

Starling, ok - but make sure the email you get from Carol has the necessary information in it. NtheP (talk) 20:44, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yoenit

The first paragraph has been changed entirely. I meant to come back to that because I didn't know that part of Buckley's life well, but as happens I forgot all about it. I put the changed paragraph, after the copyright complaint between [[]]'s.

License tagging for File:Carol with Jenny and Shirley high res.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Carol with Jenny and Shirley high res.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:CarolandBhadra 016.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CarolandBhadra 016.JPG, which you've sourced to Carol Buckley sent this photo to Starling Walter. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:17, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RonhJones

I sent 2 emails 6 hours ago to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. The emails are from Carol Buckley sending me the photos to use. The photo is attached to the email. The photo was never used in any of her writings. That is why she sent it to me to use.

I put OTRS pending in the file descriptions of the photos entitled: File:Carol with Jenny and Shirley high res.jpg and CarolandBhadra 016.JPG

What haven't I done that I haven't done?

Starling, it's ok, the OTRS takes a bit of time to process. While they're pending the files are safe from deletion. NtheP (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nthep

Carol will answer you if you want to email her about the pictures.

Starling, judging from the below Carol didn't say what you needed her to say. The permission has to be for free unlimited use anywhere not just on wikipedia. If she will grant such permission you need another email from her to that effect to sent to OTRS. NtheP (talk) 18:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carol with Jenny and Shirley high res.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carol with Jenny and Shirley high res.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carol and Tarra little house on the prarie.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Carol and Tarra little house on the prarie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CarolandBhadra 016.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CarolandBhadra 016.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2004CarolTarra.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2004CarolTarra.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Morris

Thanks for deleting the all of the images. Carol is not comfortable with giving images that others can use for commercial purposes. I think they are wonderful pictures but I am still learning about copyrights.

Question about Text Quotes[edit]

I would like to expand a Wikipedia Bio article using many quotes from the subject. The direct quotes are owned by the subject and available on her blog. The quotes illustrate the subject's powers of insight and persuasion, as well as her ability to elicit emotional responces from the reader, far better than mere analysis could ever do. So my questions are: May I use quotes without changing her copyright of the quoted material? Why don't other articles, like the bio on Winston Churchill or Oscar Wilde, use more quotes?

Thanks Starling0616 (talk) 21:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain this edit summary?[edit]

Hi Starling0616, in this edit you made reference to a personal conversation with the subject [2]. The tone and detail of the article raises multiple concerns, but for the moment a pertinent question is whether there's a conflict of interest, per WP:COI. Thank you, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see this. Yes. I put this language, about the kitten, in a long time ago, but I had no source. Someone took it out. I realize it was un-sourceable and I assume that is why it was taken out. Recently I was reading the Jane Goodall wiki article which had a very similar sounding quote: "As a child, she was given a lifelike chimpanzee stuffed animal named Jubilee by her father; her fondness for the toy started her early love of animals." I didn't see much difference in the quotes so I thought I would try again. Admitting there was no source was probably not wise. Again I am many years retired. I am paid only by UCLA and Social Security. I volunteer at our local aquarium...where I am paid in tickets. I do not know Carol Buckley, have never met her tho I did converse with her about having her donate pictures to Wikipedia.

Someone took out the list of elephants Buckley rescued. I had originally put those in some widgit that would hide them from the page. Then later I deleted the widget because it didn't display well on my phone. I would like to reinsert the founding herd and Lota and Misty. Again Jane Goodall has a list of her favorite chimps "Among those that Goodall named during her years in Gombe were:[22]

   David Greybeard, a grey-chinned male who first warmed up to Goodall;[23]
   Goliath, a friend of David Greybeard, originally the alpha male named for his bold nature;
   Mike, who through his cunning and improvisation displaced Goliath as the alpha male;
   Humphrey, a big, strong, bullysome male;
   Gigi, a large, sterile female who delighted in being the "aunt" of any young chimps or humans;
   Mr. McGregor, a belligerent older male;
   Flo, a motherly, high-ranking female with a bulbous nose and ragged ears, and her children; Figan, Faben, Freud, Fifi, and Flint;[24][25]
   Frodo, Fifi's second oldest child, an aggressive male who would frequently attack Jane, and ultimately forced her to leave the troop when he became alpha male.[26]

What do I do to have a voice in all of this? Again I have no financial or friend or relationship with Carol Buckley. btw what is this: 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC) do I have to write on this too.

to beat a dead horse. I have never had an actual live conversation with her about anything including about a kitten. I put that in as a source thinking I'd be transparent about not having a source. I heard the kitten story when I was emailing her about the pictures...giving them to wiki. BTY someone took her picture out that had her teaching a baby elephant something. How do I get that back?

July 2017[edit]

Hello, Starling0616. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This seems apt, since rather than answer the above question, you restored content that had been removed as promotional in tone. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:28, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will look at these allegations today. I have never met Buckley. I was trying to write something about the unchained film, one thing lead to another...but don't totally understand how to do this in my sandbox.

I've opened a thread here [3]. Please feel free to comment. Thank you, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the anger. I have no financial or friendship relationship with Buckley. I have never met her. I was a computer programmer for the University of California, Office of the President. I retired in 2008. I am 73 years old. I am paid by UCLA and SS for getting up every morning. Maybe the problem is that Unchained info. I was trying to over source the info so that someone like "you" would not delete it for being un-sourced. I was going to go back to it...i do not really use my sandbox.

What anger? Your edits are not neutral. You say things like "every Wikipedia article has this or that", but that's simply not true. This material is so far from neutral it couldn't see "neutral" with binoculars. Drmies (talk) 20:24, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About Carol Buckley I left this message somewhere else but it applies here too. "I have no relationship, financial or friendship with either person. I have never met Carol Buckley. I have conversed with her by email; the last extensive interactions were to get her to give pictures to Wikipedia.

My approach to Wikipedia is to try to source everything and to include in the source some words that show that the source illustrates what has been said. I think that the recent "editing" I have done on Carol Buckley is presentation formating and adding sources. I think someone hated my "Unchained" work. I did too. I was going to get back to it. I haven't seen the movie and don't know the people who made it. But I was trying to over-source, to avoid just what is happening here.

I have tried not to write hagiographies. That is why I over source.

If or where I have failed in my attempt I would like the opportunity to correct my work. Could someone please allow me to do this?

Response to the New Carol Buckley discussion=[edit]

Again: The Carol Buckley page still has a banner on it that says the that "the neutrality of the article is disputed" and that a "major contributor appears to have a close connection with its subject. " Neither of these statements is true. I would like the banner to be removed.

1. Neutrality: many of you have changed the article substantially so that neutrality, according to the changes you have made, must have been achieved by now.

2. My "close connection" with the subject: I have never met Carol Buckley. I have talked to her once, 3 years ago on the phone, not about Wikipedia. She is not my friend nor do I work for her or for anyone.

I am 73. I have been retired since 2008 from the University of California, where I worked as a Java computer programmer. I have never written articles for money. (I did work for Ardis Publishing in the early 1970s, but not for money). Today I get paid by UCLA and Social Security.

I have never worked for money with elephants or any animals. Now I volunteer (for free aquarium tickets) for our local Aquarium. The aquarium belongs to the AZA and they do not approve of sanctuaries. I have no bosses. I have no friends who know about or would be impressed by my contributions to Wikipedia.

Your conclusion that I must have some financial or friendship relationship with Carol Buckley is wrong. How can we remove those labels.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Starling0616. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Hi Starling0616! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note, the Kellie-Jay Keen-Minshull article is also subject to a consensus required restriction. Any edits that are reverted must get an affirmative consensus on the article talk page before restoration. The issue of how to describe Keen-Minshull has been extensively discussed, and based on the reliable sourcing available the NPOV compliant descriptor for her is anti-transgender rights activist. Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Beccaynr (talk) 23:06, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]