User talk:Starzoner/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5


Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula xylorrhiza has been accepted

Asperula xylorrhiza, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 08:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

References for plant articles

Please don't use The Plant List as a reference in an article about a plant. It's out of date and no longer maintained. It has been replaced by Plants of the World Online. A typical reference might look like this:

<ref name=POWO_148547-1>{{citation |mode=cs1 |title=''Linnaea chinensis'' (R.Br.) A.Braun & Vatke |work=Plants of the World Online |publisher=Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew|url=http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:148547-1 |accessdate=2020-03-09 }}</ref>

Peter coxhead (talk) 09:12, 9 March 2020 (UTC)


can I ask, when did it stop updating? And thank youm Starzoner (talk) 12:36, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
The About page says version 1.1 was released in September 2013 and the home page says TPL has been static since 2013, but was used as the starting point for the Taxonomic Backbone of the World Flora Online (WFO), and updated information can be found at www.worldfloraonline.org. —  Jts1882 | talk  13:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
ok. Starzoner (talk) 18:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Please don't use unsubstituted {{PAGENAME}}

Starzoner, while I've got you on the line - there's some agreement that using unsubstituted {{PAGENAME}} is a bad idea, not just in taxoboxes but on pages in general. I'm seeing that again in, e.g., Asperula bornmuelleri. Could I ask you not to do that please? Substituting the template would be okay, as that replaces it with a fixed text on article creation. Cheers! --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC))

Elmidae, hi, let me provide my rationale. I put them in my userspace so that I can use PAGENAME template as a way of it automatically updating the name so that when its moved to publication, it automatically updates. Although I should have done so. Anyways, I have go through the published ones and substituted them all. I will now proceed with the userspace ones. Starzoner (talk) 14:09, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank you! Note that something seems to have gone wrong with the authority ref title in Asperula bornmuelleri - you might want to keep an eye on that. - Also, let me again recommend to you the use of {{Speciesbox}} instead of {{Taxobox}}. It boils the entire thing down to four lines instead of fifteen :) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

ALso, thnaks. I'll crawl through them then. It will take some time but worth it. 16:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula gemella has been accepted

Asperula gemella, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Asperula brevifolia, from its old location at User:Starzoner/Asperula brevifolia. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:57, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft has been accepted --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 23:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Starzoner/Asperula paui has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Starzoner/Asperula paui. Thanks! — J947 (user | cont | ess), at 02:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula pauciflora has been accepted

Asperula pauciflora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— J947 (user | cont | ess), at 02:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula paui has been accepted

Asperula paui, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula polymera has been accepted

Asperula polymera, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula popovii has been accepted

Asperula popovii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula woloszczakii has been accepted

Asperula woloszczakii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Fahrettin Koca moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fahrettin Koca, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources and it is too short. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula pugionifolia has been accepted

Asperula pugionifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula rupestris has been accepted

Asperula rupestris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula wimmeriana has been accepted

Asperula wimmeriana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula bryoides has been accepted

Asperula bryoides, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula carpatica has been accepted

Asperula carpatica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula charophyton has been accepted

Asperula charophyton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula pontica has been accepted

Asperula pontica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula cilicia has been accepted

Asperula cilicia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula comosa has been accepted

Asperula comosa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula conferta has been accepted

Asperula conferta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula crassifolia has been accepted

Asperula crassifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula cretacea has been accepted

Asperula cretacea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula cristata has been accepted

Asperula cristata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

draft

Asperula neglecta has been accepted Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 03:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula cunninghamii has been accepted

Asperula cunninghamii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula cymulosa has been accepted

Asperula cymulosa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula cyrenaica has been accepted

Asperula cyrenaica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula czukavinae has been accepted

Asperula czukavinae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula crassula has been accepted

Asperula crassula, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula doerfleri has been accepted

Asperula doerfleri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula dasyantha has been accepted

Asperula dasyantha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:51, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula elonea has been accepted

Asperula elonea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula euryphylla has been accepted

Asperula euryphylla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula fedtschenkoi has been accepted

Asperula fedtschenkoi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula fragillima has been accepted

Asperula fragillima, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula friabilis has been accepted

Asperula friabilis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula galioides has been accepted

Asperula galioides, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula garganica has been accepted

Asperula garganica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:15, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula geminifolia has been accepted

Asperula geminifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula gobica has been accepted

Asperula gobica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 (talk) 06:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula graveolens

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 (talk) 06:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula gussonei has been accepted

Asperula gussonei, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 (talk) 06:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula hirta has been accepted

Asperula hirta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula hoskingii has been accepted

Asperula hoskingii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula kotschyana has been accepted

Asperula kotschyana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CNMall41 (talk) 07:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula glabrata has been accepted

Asperula glabrata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula glareosa has been accepted

Asperula glareosa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula glomerata has been accepted

Asperula glomerata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula gracilis has been accepted

Asperula gracilis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula hirsuta has been accepted

Asperula hirsuta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula podlechii has been accepted

Asperula podlechii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula pinifolia has been accepted

Asperula pinifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula pestalozzae (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Returned for editing of pagename template.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Asperula perpusilla has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Asperula perpusilla. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula perpusilla has been accepted

Asperula perpusilla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula peloritana has been accepted

Asperula peloritana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula pedicellata (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Needs work as described
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Robert McClenon, fixed. Starzoner (talk) 16:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula oppositifolia (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
See comments at User talk:Robert McClenon. Fix the pagename in the template thingy.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula icarica (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Returned as described.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula oppositifolia has been accepted

Asperula oppositifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula ophiolithica (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Please substitute the species name.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula oetaea (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Also the genus name is doubled in the taxobox, but that is probably an artifact of the way that the templates work.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula oblanceolata (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Clean this one up too please. But thank you for doing the initial work of creating all of the stubs for all of the species in this genus.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula idaea has been accepted

Asperula idaea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula inopinata has been accepted

Asperula inopinata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula nuratensis has been accepted

Asperula nuratensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula nitida has been accepted

Asperula nitida, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula insignis has been accepted

Asperula insignis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula insolita has been accepted

Asperula insolita, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula involucrata has been accepted

Asperula involucrata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula jordanii has been accepted

Asperula jordanii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula kovalevskiana has been accepted

Asperula kovalevskiana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula karategini has been accepted

Asperula karategini, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula lasiantha has been accepted

Asperula lasiantha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula kemulariae has been accepted

Asperula kemulariae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula kryloviana has been accepted

Asperula kryloviana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula libanotica has been accepted

Asperula libanotica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula lilaciflora has been accepted

Asperula lilaciflora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula lipskyana has been accepted

Asperula lipskyana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula litardierei has been accepted

Asperula litardierei, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula littoralis has been accepted

Asperula littoralis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula lutea has been accepted

Asperula lutea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula lycia has been accepted

Asperula lycia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula neilreichii has been accepted

Asperula neilreichii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula naufraga has been accepted

Asperula naufraga, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Asperula muscosa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Asperula muscosa. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula mungieri has been accepted

Asperula mungieri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula molluginoides has been accepted

Asperula molluginoides, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula pedicellata has been accepted

Asperula pedicellata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Asperula abbreviata has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Asperula abbreviata. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula abbreviata has been accepted

Asperula abbreviata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula majoriflora has been accepted

Asperula majoriflora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula markothensis has been accepted

Asperula markothensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula mazanderanica has been accepted

Asperula mazanderanica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Asperula microphylla has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Asperula microphylla. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula minima has been accepted

Asperula minima, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:20, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula syrticola has been accepted

Asperula syrticola, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula szovitsii has been accepted

Asperula szovitsii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Please pay attention to the formatting - your stubs require a lot of cleanup...

Starzoner, I hate to harp on about this, but your newly submitted stubs still have a number of issues that have to be cleaned up by other people afterward.

  • You still use unsubstituted {{PAGENAME}} in several places, as in e.g. Asperula carpatica[1]. Could you please not do that?
  • Haven't you noticed that every single one of these articles uses title = '' {{PAGENAME}}'' Sims in the title for the authority? If you don't want to place the actual author there, please leave the author name out entirely in that location.
  • The material you are putting under "Description" is not what should go under that subtopic - "Description" is for appearance and morphology. Your content is one item about distribution and a note about date of taxonomic origin. Either is too short for a section of its own, and very unlikely to be expanded in the near future; in a stub you would just put all that into one paragraph without subsections (as I have been implementing for those stubs of yours that I have seen).
  • There's no real consensus imperative to make use of the automatic taxobox system, but I don't understand why you prefer your current 15 line manual taxobox over this:

{{Speciesbox | taxon = Asperula carpatica | authority = ... }}

Done. Takes a fraction of the time to set up, and will automatically update forever after. Please take these tips to mind. Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Okay, I have to amend this - I see that in some recent ones you actually do use the speciesbox setup. Thanks for that! :) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:28, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula subulifolia has been accepted

Asperula subulifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 20:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
@KylieTastic and Theroadislong: Right now, the error tracking Category:Automatic_taxobox_cleanup is full of articles accepted here, all of which will have to be cleaned up. Why are articles with such errors being accepted? It's wasting a lot of editor time. Please will you all stop! Peter coxhead (talk) 22:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
@Starzoner: I don't blame you as a new and enthusiastic editor for creating these errors, but you could usefully help to clean them up. The problem appears to be that you have included '' around the value of taxon parameters in automated taxoboxes, which causes the taxobox not to work. I'm amazed that this wasn't noticed. You should always check a new article to see that its taxobox is o.k. The articles in the error checking category are manifestly not o.k. Peter coxhead (talk) 23:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Taxon articles should also include a taxonbar template. It would be useful if you could do this. If you don't know about {{taxonbar}} I'll be happy to help. Peter coxhead (talk) 23:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
User:Peter coxhead - Since you seem to be implying that the reviewers let bad articles into article space, I will explain about AFC review. Different Wikipedia volunteers understand different volunteer tasks, and sometimes we need to explain. I assume that you work in WikiProject Plants. Let me explain about AFC review. The primary question for the AFC reviewer is whether a draft should be in article space, based on whether it will survive an Articles for Deletion discussion. It doesn't have to be perfect. It is understood that if a draft will be Kept in a deletion discussion, even if it needs work, it should be accepted, and can be improved in article space. Most of what we see at AFC is crud, drafts about non-notable people, garage bands, and small businesses. It is pleasant and rare to see an editor who contributes a large number of good drafts, and these were good drafts, in that they clearly satisfied notability and verifiability. They did need to be cleaned up, but User:Theroadislong, User:KylieTastic, and I were glad to see documented species, items of human knowledge, which should be in Wikipedia, even if they had to be cleaned up. That is why we accepted them. It wasn't wasted editor time, and we thank you for the time to clean them up. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
I will basically echo what was said above by Robert McClennon. We don't always clean up articles that are moved to the mainspace. If we did, very few would actually get approved through AfC. As Wikipedia is never finished, articles such as these (as opposed to a lot of spam that comes through AfC) deserve to be moved to mainspace and then cleaned up by anyone feeling up to it. I didn't want to deny them for technical reasons when they meet notability guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Peter coxhead, well Category:Automatic taxobox cleanup is not full of anything any more and you weren't editing after this fixing them to locate that way, so it's difficult to tell what the issue is. When I saw the notification just as I went to bed I thought I had been part of some major issue somehow, but we obviously have different ideas of categories being 'full' - in Category:AfC pending submissions by age we have thousands in the backlog and hundreds added every day (over 400 submits yesterday), and as Robert McClenon said most are crud and a real waste of time. So sorry if the odd error makes it though as we try to keep on top of this workload, while making sure notable topics get accepted. I looked at my last accept Asperula subulifolia and it has not been edited since to clean it up, nor does it have an Automatic taxobox. Previous to that I last accepted weevils on the 22 of February, so I'm really baffled to the "errors being accepted" with myself pinged! I checked the last 10 of Theroadislong accepts, and 8 have either not been edited since, or it was Starzoner themselves improving. 2 others were cleaned up by Plantdrew that I have thanked before for their efforts, but neither of those had automated taxoboxes either! I did find Asperula gussonei in your edit history that had been left in a bad state with clear template errors. I would never knowingly have left any like this, but checking all of the others accepted by CNMall41 I didn't see the same again, so a friendly message to them about this one particular article would have seemed more appropriate. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 10:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
@KylieTastic: almost all the Asperula articles were in the tracking category at first, and were cleaned up by Plantdrew. I would suggest that putting these articles into Draft space in the first instance would have been the best course of action. However, I see that this is not what AfC editors think appropriate, so I'll leave it. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Peter coxhead, maybe I'm still missing something but even this that you fixed up from ''{{PAGENAME}}'' has a Speciesbox not a Automatic taxobox, do Speciesbox errors appear in Category:Automatic taxobox cleanup? Most of the changes to Asperula that Plantdrew has been doing appear to be from using "taxon" to "genus"+"species". I assume your not talking about that as you left Asperula gussonei with the taxon option used. I have looked several times in Category:Automatic taxobox cleanup to keep an eye on if there was a type of issue I hadn't spotted but every-time I've looked it's been empty - so still not sure what errors these are? Unfortunately WikiProjects don't appear to monitor drafts, so nuances like "genus"+"species" over "taxon" will almost never be noticed or changed before acceptance. Someone is working of using ORES to sort submissions to aid projects/editors find submissions of interest but the current all in one version User:SD0001/AfC_sorting does not appear to have a plant category. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 12:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
@KylieTastic: because the various automated taxoboxes were developed at different times, being developed from {{Automatic taxobox}}, there's some overlap between the error tracking categories. The change that Plantdrew makes between "taxon" and "genus"+"species" just reflects a preference he has; it doesn't make any difference, both are o.k. Most of the errors were caused by the presence of '' around parameter values.
Drafts with faulty taxoboxes usually show up in the tracking categories, so will get fixed. I monitor the categories most days, and errors normally get fixed quickly. The issue here was the speed at which articles were created combined with the apparent "seal of approval" of the AfC process, which I had not understood does not in fact mean much in terms of things like taxobox correctness.
User:Peter coxhead - As I noted, the seal of approval of AFC indicates that we think that the draft passes verifiability and notability. Some of us have varying degrees of knowledge of various types of infoboxes; and taxoboxes are among the most useful but most complicated types of infoboxes. It isn't a function of AFC to enforce the rules of a WikiProject about infoboxes or any other useful detail. So that means that there is and reasonably should be a multi-stage review process. Other areas of knowledge also have their own specialized considerations that can be applied after an article is in article space. If a taxobox "looks wrong", I may note that it looks wrong and decline it, or I may note that it looks wrong and accept it. But my role at AFC is to decide whether the draft will survive an AFD discussion, and it will if it describes a species. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:05, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Anyway, the situation is now resolved. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

First, I deeply apologize for all the mess I made earlier. As much as I wanted to add content, I think I should have not spammed AFC like that and. I think i got a decent amount of the mess and cleaned some of the mess up. I was actually reminded by the honourable Elmidae, to switch the taxoboxes to speciesbox so I did, and I have missed major errors in switching to them. I will use that from the start next time. Starzoner (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

User:Starzoner - No apology to the AFC volunteers is needed. I thank you for providing us with edible canned meat, or, since these were botanical species, edible canned vegetables. Whether you should apologize to the WikiProject Plants volunteers is between you and them. But we at AFC are glad to see drafts that pass notability and verifiability. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:05, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula icarica has been accepted

Asperula icarica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula seticornis has been accepted

Asperula seticornis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula sintenisii has been accepted

Asperula sintenisii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula taygetea has been accepted

Asperula taygetea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula suavis has been accepted

Asperula suavis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula strishovae has been accepted

Asperula strishovae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula stricta has been accepted

Asperula stricta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula staliana has been accepted

Asperula staliana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:52, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula sordide-rosea has been accepted

Asperula sordide-rosea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:52, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula setosa has been accepted

Asperula setosa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:53, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Polygalaceae

Ping me when they are ready to go. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:15, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asperula sherardioides has been accepted

Asperula sherardioides, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:34, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

even if afc items are cleared

It is extraordinarily difficult to deal with items described as It was first described in 2009 and is endemic to Australia

Australia hampir sama sama dengan Indonesia for size and diversity, if you created an item for Indonesian endamic plants like that, the AFC clearing persons are letting you get away with a problem - it could be north sumatra or lombok - there is a vast geographical range it could be (or not), please make an effort if you are going for bulk uploads of one liners, to at least the courtesy to identify where... thank you JarrahTree 07:41, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Hidden categories

I suspect you don't have showing hidden categories turned on. If when logged in you go to Special:Preferences, then the "Appearance" tab, under "Advanced options", there's a checkbox "Show hidden categories". If you tick this, then you will see extra categories that track issues with pages. For example, right now Asperula sherardioides has the normally hidden category "Taxobox articles possibly missing a taxonbar", as indeed it does. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Peter coxhead, thoughts on User:Starzoner/Securidaca acuminata? Starzoner (talk) 21:26, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Seems good. I added a stub template (using Category:Plant stubs to find the nearest for this species). So now it can be moved to Securidaca acuminata, and finished off by adding the "en" entry at the Wikidata item, and putting {{WikiProject Plants|class=stub|importance=low|needs-image=yes}} on its talk page. Can you make the move? Peter coxhead (talk) 22:31, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salomonia ciliata has been accepted

Salomonia ciliata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:34, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salomonia cantoniensis has been accepted

Salomonia cantoniensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:36, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salomonia kradungensis has been accepted

Salomonia kradungensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:55, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala alpestris has been accepted

Polygala alpestris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salomonia thailandica has been accepted

Salomonia thailandica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:52, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Polygala alpestris, from its old location at User:Starzoner/Polygala alpestris. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:37, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Socio-economic impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic

On 17 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Socio-economic impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 05:56, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Indefensible, omg, lol I'm surprised this reached the front page!!!!! Amazing. I'm honoured. Starzoner (talk) 17:08, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

It's a very important subject with worldwide significance, so good job on the article. Now that it is on the frontpage where it belongs, probably millions of people will see your work. Keep it up! - Indefensible (talk) 17:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Stuff in my userpage

hmmm, I wish to rename all my userspace drafts (currently incubating) to be moved to drafts. Is there a way to do so without leaving redirects? I rather not go through them and tag them all. Starzoner (talk) 00:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:2020 coronavirus pandemic in Timor Leste, from its old location at User:Starzoner/2020 coronavirus pandemic in Timor Leste. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:52, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

  • Be careful with your find-and-replace changes. In one case,[2] you introduced inaccuracies in the title of a cited source. —C.Fred (talk) 23:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
    • I apologize. I have edited it so that it does bypass the redirect, but not the url. Starzoner (talk) 23:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Starzoner

Thank you for creating Landscapes of Dauria.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Capitals

Remember to capitalize coronavirus when it's the first word in a sentence or category. I fixed a few, but please take a look over what you've done so far and fix them. Thanks. -- Valjean (talk) 19:45, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

"2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Nova Scotia" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Nova Scotia. Since you had some involvement with the 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Nova Scotia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ComplexRational (talk) 19:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

"2020 coronavirus pandemic in Burundi" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Burundi. Since you had some involvement with the 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Burundi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Luxemborg

A tag has been placed on 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Luxemborg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 18:43, 2 April 2020 (UTC)


You're an admin, please delete it yourself. Starzoner (talk) 19:59, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Polygala apopetala, from its old location at User:Starzoner/Polygala apopetala. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 20:14, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Polygala apopetala has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Polygala apopetala. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 20:30, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala apopetala has been accepted

Polygala apopetala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Lord of the Rings (TV series) (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Adaptations of The Lord of the Rings instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 21:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Starzoner! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 21:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

"2020 United States House of Representatives election in New Jersey" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2020 United States House of Representatives election in New Jersey. Since you had some involvement with the 2020 United States House of Representatives election in New Jersey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 18:43, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

2020 coronavirus pandemic in Nauru 2

I'm confused why you moved 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Nauru to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Nauru 2. 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Nauru was a redirect, and redirects should usually not be moved per WP:MOVEREDIRECT, especially not to a title that's obviously not useful. Is there something I'm missing? -- Tavix (talk) 22:19, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

I've tagged "my" redirect for deletion so it can be moved back. I was thinking the redirect could be in my name when i came around to build an article around it but I kid of lost interest in the eventual construction of the page. Starzoner (talk) 23:51, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

4-digit years

Hi Starzoner, I would appreciate if you would stop moving the articles back, as 4-digit years are the preferred form per MOS and I am trying to achieve consistency here. Also, the conflict will (unfortunately) likely continue into 2021, for which the deprecated abbreviated 2-digit form would not be allowed anyway. Greetings, --Matthiaspaul (talk) 12:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Matthiaspaul, I have a few questions why.
1) how do you know it will go into next year, forcing it to be 4 digits?
And why not have it at the 4-2 digit format until it actually does? what prevents it from being there?
2) it seems a group of people had decided to do at that title. Personally, iirc, you have to get another group of people to agree to that in order to have it renamed again.
I hope it helps. Unless I'm mistaken for something.
Regards,
Starzoner (talk) 18:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Starzoner,
Thanks for replying.
Ad 1) Of course, I cannot predict the future, but such conflicts typically don't stop out of a sudden (unfortunately), and the current pandemic may even slow down a resolution even further (or fuel the conflict to end in even more violence - hopefully not). So, in theory, we could leave the status quo for the remaining couple of months, it is just that I was coming around now and if you had not interrupted me, we would have achieved consistency by now. ;-)
Ad 2) Thank you for pointing to that move discussion, I was not aware of it. A new discussion would be possible, or per WP:BRD I could be bold and see if it sticks.
I consider compliance with our Manual of Style stronger than that discussion, in particular as some of the participants were clearly unexperienced and misinformed. One of them was even talking about a "policy" to use the "-20" form - of course, there is no policy for either form. What we do have is a guideline asking us for consistency (and this is exactly what I was about to achieve). There are other articles already spanning over three and more years, so they have to use 4-digit years, anyway, and to achieve consistency, the few articles that do not follow this scheme should be renamed. In 2016 we had an RFC with the outcome to preferrably use 4-digit years. Also, we have our Manual of Style (WP:YEARRANGE), which asks us to generally use 4-digit ranges as well (but allows a number of exceptions). These exceptions are typically used for sport seasons and other annual events overlapping the flip of the year, and for which a common naming pattern exists per WP:COMMONNAME. This does not really apply to topics for which no such inherent naming convention exists, but was arbitrarily chosen. Finally, while we support ymd dates only in a number of specific areas, the format is meanwhile a common format in many areas of the world, so forms like "????-??" are likely to be interpreted as "yyyy-mm" first, and then need to be corrected in mind to "yyyy-yy" since "20" isn't a month. While this is not causing actual ambiguity in this particular case, it is at least slowing down the decoding of the form "????-??", thus, making it more difficult to read. In 2019, a new version of ISO 8601 was issued, this added so called EDTF formats to the table, f.e. "2019-21" now officially and internationally means "spring 2019".[3] While it is good that such spans can now be encoded numerically as well, it is making it even more likely that someone will see "????-??" as some form of "yyyy-mm" rather than "yyyy-yy" first.
"2019-20" is really a corner case, and we could accept it for a couple of months longer, but do we really have to? I don't see any advantages in keeping it. If we can achieve consistency now, why wait for much longer?
--Matthiaspaul (talk) 20:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Information icon Hello and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I saw that an article you created, 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Nunavut has not been added to any categories. According to the guideline Wikipedia:Categorization, every article should be in at least one category. Please help by adding categories to the articles you create. You can take a look at the categorization FAQ. If you need further help, ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:32, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Jax 0677, I think I fixed the page. Starzoner (talk) 18:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK

I don't plan on reviewing your DYK (2020 coronavirus pandemic in Nunavut), but would this be a good alt?

ALT1: ...that residents of Rankin Inlet, Nunavut blocked access to a local goldmine over fears of COVID-19, over a month before Nunavut reported its first case of COVID-19? Nunavut community blocks access to gold mine over COVID-19 fears, March 19, 2020; Nunavut begins contact tracing in connection with first COVID-19 case, April 30, 2020 Username6892 16:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Username6892, I guess that works as well. :) Starzoner (talk) 16:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
I noticed that you haven't done your QPQ yet. Username6892 12:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
This would be by first ever DYK for QPQ. If I screw up, I would not return to doing so. Starzoner (talk) 01:56, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Username6892, they don't have to do a QPQ for their first 5 DYKS. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:11, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

COVID–19 pandemic rename

Hi Starzoner, I thank you for renaming to the article COVID–19 pandemic. Now, I have accidentally move the Tennessee article COVID-19 pandemic in Tennessee and I revert it back myself with my explanation error. I see the main article titled as COVID-19 pandemic. Could you request the move to main article COVID–19 pandemic to include the n-dash there is a problem between the hyphen and the n-dash. The COVID-19 pandemic need to rename to replace the hyphen symbol to an en-dash like this COVID–19 pandemic. So I thank you for helping you and I know I can't finish it all titles to rename to an en-dash. I hope you can answer me ASAP. All the best and good luck to you. Steam5 (talk) 03:41, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


Hello Steam5, thank you for the fix. I appreciate it. I will fo fix myself and the pages. Thank you for telling me. Starzoner (talk) 03:43, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Starzoner, I have requested the technical move to COVID–19 pandemic. Look for the title at the requested move/technical request list. Steam5 (talk) 03:47, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
@Steam5 and Starzoner: Before you get knee-deep into this... what is the basis for the use of the endash? I can't find any pages that use it. Our Coronavirus disease 2019 page certainly does not. -- tariqabjotu 03:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Oh, I almost forgot, to confirm with the en-dash included on related titles please continue talking to User:Paintspot to confirm it. Steam5 (talk) 03:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
@Tariqabjotu: En-dash is a medium size dash and hyphen is a smallest dash punctuation. I know I can't finish all of them so I will let User:Starzoner to rename all of them to an en-dash so I will get some sleep. Thank you. Steam5 (talk) 03:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
@Steam5: I know that there is a difference between a hyphen and the endash. I am saying that your suggestion to use the endash is not consistent with usage anywhere on Wikipedia, as far as I can tell. So I don't understand where this is originating from. Note that your technical move request has been declined (by someone else); the move to COVID-19 pandemic was consistent with exactly what was proposed on the talk page of the article. -- tariqabjotu 04:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello @Starzoner: and @Steam5:! While I can appreciate the en-dash in general, the most-used spelling of the term is “COVID-19” with a regular standard dash (-) and not an en-dash (–). An overwhelming majority of reliable sources use the regular dash instead of an en-dash. Additionally, the subpages should be consistent with the title that the main page is at (which, as proposed in the main Requested move, is with the regular dash). Paintspot Infez (talk) 04:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)


Paintspot and Tariquabjotu, to acknowledge one bit of knowledge learned today, I will use the short dansh instead of the en dash. Just fyi, I live in the east coast USA, so I was alseep when you sent the messages. Starzoner (talk) 12:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
That's fine. By the way, as you probably noticed since I see we conflicted, I used the mass-move tool to move the remaining subpages to the Template:COVID-19 pandemic data template. -- tariqabjotu 12:48, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Tariqabjotu, can I ask if it I'd possible to rename a category faster than the 48 hour speedy wait? I was hoping to move the categories without needing to wait. Starzoner (talk) 13:59, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

COVID-19 pandemic in Mainland China

hey, just a heads up I reverted the edits because they changed the link to the main pandemic article. Kylo Ren (talk) 16:43, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Confirmation that I had made a simple mistake with the redirect. Just this one. Everything else is fine. Starzoner (talk) 16:45, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Good Sam has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Good Sam. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:43, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

WP:NOTBROKEN

Hello Starzoner, can you please show me where the consensus was found to use AWB to change thousands of links that are WP:NOTBROKEN from 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic to COVID-19 pandemic? ST47 (talk) 23:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello ST47, I had edited because I thought it was appropriate to do so since the name was changed, and it was a bit more accurate. I don't see a consensus to do. I am sorry and I will stop. Starzoner (talk) 23:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Similar question, is there some reason why the template redirect {{Infobox Athleticrace}} needed to be replaced? If you want to do these things, you should find consensus and get a bot approval, so that it does not flood recent changes and peoples' watchlists. ST47 (talk) 23:27, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
I didn't want the thing to be pointing to redirects. and I acknowledge the intended message. If I want to do the same changes, I will seek consensus so it does not flood watchlists. Starzoner (talk) 23:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

bypass redirect

There are two things to consider: the bypassing of the redirect, and what the reader sees. Please don't conflate one for the other; that is, consider using [[COVID-19 pandemic|2019–20 coronavirus pandemic]] since "COVID-19 pandemic" is, believe it or not, far less descriptive.

That is, by not using a pipe, you lose the info about the year, useful when you talk about things "this and that happened because of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic". The point in sentences like these is that something happened during the 2019-2020 season. This dating is lost when the link is bluntly replaced. While you might think everybody knows what the 19 in COVID-19 means, that is not something we should take for granted - the encyclopedia will exist even when people no longer remembers the specifics. CapnZapp (talk) 05:00, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

CapnZapp I appreciate you coming and typing this comment out. Definitely learned something today. Thank you. Starzoner (talk) 19:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Duplicate Draft:Percy Jackson draft

Hi buddy! Noticed you have created another draft for Draft:Percy Jackson and the Olympians (TV series)! You can improve the existing draft for the series. I think it's best if we merge with already existing draft so we can avoid confusion. Saichaitanya4496 (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala crucianelloides has been accepted

Polygala crucianelloides, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala dasyphylla has been accepted

Polygala dasyphylla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala cymosa has been accepted

Polygala cymosa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Mandalorian (film)

Hello, Starzoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Mandalorian".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:A Nightmare on Elm Street (TV series)

Hello, Starzoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "A Nightmare on Elm Street".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 13:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

COVID-19 pandemic in Nunavut

Hi, I promoted your hook to Prep 4 at DYK. I would like to ask you to keep an eye on the Nunavut reporting and let us know at WT:DYK if any cases are reported. (I will also be keeping an eye on this.) I'd also like to ask that you update the first sentence in the article to a date this week. If all goes well, Prep 4 will appear on the main page on May 29. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:29, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Yoninah, thanks. Glad to hear it will appear on May 29. I will keep an eye out and updated. :) Starzoner (talk) 01:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 03:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Man-Wolf (film)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Man-Wolf (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Information is from an unreliable source and has not been confirmed or mentioned by the studio.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Solo (upcoming film)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Solo (upcoming film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Information is from an unreliable source and has not been confirmed or mentioned by the studio.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Man-Wolf

A tag has been placed on Draft:Man-Wolf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect to draft up for speedy delete from several renames.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ManWolf

A tag has been placed on Draft:ManWolf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect to draft up for speedy delete from several renames.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Man Wolf

A tag has been placed on Draft:Man Wolf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect to draft up for speedy delete from several renames.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Man Wolf (upcoming film)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Man Wolf (upcoming film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect to draft up for speedy delete from several renames.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ManWolf (upcoming film)

A tag has been placed on Draft:ManWolf (upcoming film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect to draft up for speedy delete from several renames.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Man-Wolf (upcoming film)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Man-Wolf (upcoming film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect to draft up for speedy delete from several renames.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ManWolf (film)

A tag has been placed on Draft:ManWolf (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirect to draft up for speedy delete from several renames.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Man-Wolf (film)

Draft:Man-Wolf (film), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Man-Wolf (film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Man-Wolf (film) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Fugitive

Hello, Starzoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Fugitive".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for COVID-19 pandemic in Nunavut

On 29 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article COVID-19 pandemic in Nunavut, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that residents of Rankin Inlet, Nunavut, blocked access to a local goldmine over fears of COVID-19, even though Nunavut had no confirmed cases? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, COVID-19 pandemic in Nunavut), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2021 New Jersey elections

Hello, Starzoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 New Jersey elections".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Untitled The Chronicles of Narnia project

Hello, Starzoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Untitled The Chronicles of Narnia project".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala glochidiata has been accepted

Polygala glochidiata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:01, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala hottentotta has been accepted

Polygala hottentotta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala hecatantha has been accepted

Polygala hecatantha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala hookeri has been accepted

Polygala hookeri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:07, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala hemipterocarpa has been accepted

Polygala hemipterocarpa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:08, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Untitled Aladdin spinoff

Hello, Starzoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Untitled Aladdin spinoff".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 17:55, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, Starzoner. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Anarchyte (talk • work) 05:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

"2020 Spain lockdowns" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information icon A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2020 Spain lockdowns. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#2020 Spain lockdowns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:01, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Polygala nitida has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Polygala nitida. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala nitida has been accepted

Polygala nitida, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 15:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polygala nicaeensis has been accepted

Polygala nicaeensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 15:23, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
I'm curious why you're using AfC for these plant stubs? You're an experienced user and the topics are obviously notable, so I'm sure no one would mind if you created these in mainspace. :) Spicy (talk) 15:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Polygala longicaulis moved to draftspace

Hi Starzoner, you left off the refs here (but we got an image to compensate :). Can you fix this up please? Cheers Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Salem’s Lot (film)

You recently moved this draft article from 'Salem’s Lot (film). The film is based on 'Salem's Lot, which is the original novel by Stephen King. Just wanted to hear your thoughts as to why the apostrophe was removed from the title as it should contain it and should be reverted. Thanks. KaitoNkmra23 (talk) 22:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

sorry thought it looked odd. I'll move it back. Starzoner (talk) 22:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
No problems. Just make sure to provide the reason for moving pages. Thanks. KaitoNkmra23 (talk) 22:56, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

GS

Please read this notice carefully.

You are receiving this notice because you recently edited one or more pages relating to blockchain or cryptocurrencies topics. You have not done anything wrong. We just want to alert you that "general" sanctions are authorized for certain types of edits to those pages.

A community decision has authorized the use of general sanctions for pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after the editor has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Jtbobwaysf (talk) 21:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

What? Can you point to me where I edited a block chain related page? Starzoner (talk) 22:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Zootopia 2

Hello, Starzoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zootopia 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk) 08:37, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Happy Halloween, Scooby-Doo!

Notice

The article Happy Halloween, Scooby-Doo! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy film notability guidelines, in particular with respect to future film guidelines. The article was declined as a draft as not satisfying film notability, but then moved to article space, bypassing AFC, which is permitted, but runs the risk of deletion. The edit summary for the move to article space states that a trailer has been released, which is true but irrelevant. There are various myths about the notability of unreleased films, such as that they are notable when principal photography begins or when a trailer is released. In fact, theatrical release does not guarantee that a film is notable, only that it will probably be notable. This film does not yet satisfy film notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:11, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Happy Halloween, Scooby-Doo! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Happy Halloween, Scooby-Doo! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Halloween, Scooby-Doo! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY2008 17:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Jersey Crabs

Hey! I noticed that you recently created the article Jersey Crabs, although it looks like you started it in your user space [4]. I was just curious if this is a copy of a previous Draft, as it has draft templates when you created it? If so, it would be best to request a history merge of the article so editors can see where information came from, who edited it, and when edits were made. Thanks! BOVINEBOY2008 17:48, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Jersey Crabs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jersey Crabs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jersey Crabs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sarah Mbi Enow Anyang

Hello, Starzoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sarah Mbi Enow Anyang".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lovecraft (film)

Hello, Starzoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lovecraft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sour Hearts

Hello, Starzoner. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sour Hearts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 13:37, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

"2022 United States House of Representatives elections in Maine" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2022 United States House of Representatives elections in Maine. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 30#2022 United States House of Representatives elections in Maine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:2022 United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2022 United States House of Representatives elections in Ohio. Thanks! JMHamo (talk) 17:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Starzoner

Thank you for creating Schefflera abyssinica.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. We tilt wp:notability a bit for plants/animals, but usually not down to the species level unless well known, but I'm marking it as reviewed. Is there an error in the first line....should "arboricola" be "abyssinica"? Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Starzoner

Thank you for creating Schefflera acaropunctata.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. We tilt wp:notability a bit for plants/animals, but usually not down to the species level unless well known, but I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Starzoner

Thank you for creating Schefflera acuminata.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. We tilt wp:notability a bit for plants/animals, but usually not down to the species level unless well known, but I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Starzoner

Thank you for creating Schefflera acuminatissima.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. We tilt wp:notability a bit for plants/animals, but usually not down to the species level unless well known, but I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Starzoner

Thank you for creating Schefflera acutissima.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. We tilt wp:notability a bit for plants/animals, but usually not down to the species level unless well known, but I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Starzoner

Thank you for creating Schefflera albocapitata.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. We tilt wp:notability a bit for plants/animals, but usually not down to the species level unless well known, but I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Starzoner/Archive_2&oldid=1065854453"