User talk:Stefanie at FMC CorpCom

Welcome!

Hello, Stefanie at FMC CorpCom, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Stefanie at FMC CorpCom, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bennv3771 (talk) 08:52, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Stefanie at FMC CorpCom

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Stefanie at FMC CorpCom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bennv3771 (talk) 08:52, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How to correctly disclose paid editing?

Hi Bennv3771, thanks for welcoming me. Can you please let me know why my user page was deleted? Since my intention was to fully comply with the Terms of Use and the Wikipedia policy WP:Paid editing, I disclosed my employer to the community as required. I have published the exact same information in the German Wikipedia (and had my account verified, too). Any help would be much appreciated. --Stefanie at FMC CorpCom (talk) 14:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Stefanie at FMC CorpCom: Hi Stefanie! Apologies, I did not realise your intention as the deleted userpage did not state the intention to edit for pay. You can put Template:Paid on your userpage to comply with WP:Paid editing. For example, just paste this on your userpage: {{paid|employer=FMC CorpCom}} --Bennv3771 (talk) 14:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, will do. Thank you very much for the quick feedback! --Stefanie at FMC CorpCom (talk) 14:41, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Maurice (Rice) Powell Jr. (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

People do not get into Wikipedia by having staff profiles on the website of their own company, or by having entries in business directories like Reuters -- people get into Wikipedia by having reliable source media outlets do journalism about them. So the Bloomberg citation is a start, but it's not enough by itself.
Also, your username explicitly identifies you as an employee of the company Powell heads -- so you need to familiarize yourself with, and follow, our conflict of interest rules.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Maurice (Rice) Powell Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert Maurice (Rice) Powell Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bearcat (talk) 20:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stefanie at FMC CorpCom! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 20:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Maurice (Rice) Powell Jr. (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

not clear what makes him notable?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Maurice (Rice) Powell Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert Maurice (Rice) Powell Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:41, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Maurice (Rice) Powell Jr. (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement in notability since previous submit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Maurice (Rice) Powell Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert Maurice (Rice) Powell Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:33, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Rice Powell

Draft:Rice Powell, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rice Powell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Rice Powell during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Rice Powell. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joseph2302, Thanks for your advice. However, I do not consider this article as promotional material as it is written in an absolutely neutral manner stating only facts accounted for by reliable references. Let me know if you can help me with improving it, any input is much appreciated. Thank you. Stefanie at FMC CorpCom (talk) 10:57, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]