User talk:Steve the Swan

July 2023[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Swansea have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Swansea was changed by Steve the Swan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881039 on 2023-07-12T09:41:08+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Swansea, you may be blocked from editing. Technopat (talk) 09:42, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Technopat (talk) 09:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Euryalus (talk) 10:04, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Steve the Swan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Swansea is the wettest city in the United Kingdom. How was Draft:Philip Copley an attack page? In my opinion, it should be Technopat who should be blocked, not me. Cheers, Steve the Swan (talk) 10:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have taken a look at your edits, and I am fully confident the block is correct. PhilKnight (talk) 11:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Steve the Swan (talk) 10:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Technopat (talk) 10:04, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Too late to discuss that now. @Joseph2302: fyi. Steve the Swan (talk) 10:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For reviewing admin[edit]

Regarding part of the unblock request, the following diff, taken in conjunction with the draft page the same user added earlier (but which has now been deleted), may be of interest:

[1]

Technopat (talk) 10:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]