Jump to content

User talk:Steven Hipkins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Im new to wikipedia help me build my page.

January 2008

[edit]

Hi, my addition of contents to the Girlfriend article was actually reverting what I consider your vandalism of removing content without any consensus to do so. Please gain support for such deletions on the talk page - you'll see I had previously responded to your statements there. Benjiboi 16:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POINT

[edit]

Just what WP:POINT are you trying to make. BSA is the largest youth organization in America, by far. I found a ref that said so, can you find one that says no? One more and you're in 3RR violation. Not to mention your meatpuppeting with Gothgirl puts in vio already. RlevseTalk 23:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not threatening you, I warned you, that's what we're supposed to do vice edit war. Since you're a new editor, you may not know that. I'm not picking on her, she keeps altering the text to skew it. To say it's the largest boy organization distorts the facts. RlevseTalk 23:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GSUSA is NOT coed at all, but BSA is only in the older youth programs. What part of that do you fail to understand? RlevseTalk 23:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Boy Scouts of America. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Also please note that edit summaries like this may violate Wikipedia's No personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not the contributor. Dreadstar 23:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Gothgirlangel1981 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. RlevseTalk 01:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The evidence of sockpuppetry looks very convincing. Indef blocking sock, and 24 hour block for the master. Dreadstar 03:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]