User talk:Stevepeterson

Arbcom

Steve you need to remove both of the Arbcom requests now otherwise you're going to be blocked, The first one is fine but the other 2 are not. –Davey2010^Talk 16:54, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

thank you , why is that? What can I do? Can I reopen the 1st? -Stevepeterson (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Well I did warn you, Once your block has expired I would recommend dropping this altogether otherwise you're going to find yourself blocked indefinitely. –Davey2010^Talk 17:07, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

You really are doing yourself no favors.Slatersteven (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Guy (Help!) 17:02, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Please take this time to read and understand a few essays: I like WP:TIGERS and WP:NCR, others who are watching this page may have other suggestions. Seriously, at this point, you are in a deep hole and digging furiously. Guy (Help!) 17:03, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

A word of advice, when you do appeal do not make it about anyone else, you need to show why the block is not needed.Slatersteven (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

I consider what you have been doing to Perfect to be harassment. If you ever come back I strongly suggest apologizing for that behavior. Legacypac (talk) 19:38, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Requests for Arbitration

The two requests for arbitration you filed, namely Personal Attack with disgracing insults by Future Perfect at Sunrise and CONSTANT HARASSMENT BY Future Perfect at Sunrise, have been declined by the Arbitration Committee. You are encouraged to work collaboratively with the other editors at the incidents noticeboard and the article talk pages to find resolution to this dispute. Bradv🍁 19:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Banned

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely to enforce a community ban ^[1]. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲_水 07:56, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Byzantine musicians theofilos.jpg

The file File:Byzantine musicians theofilos.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Stagakis manolis2.png

The file File:Stagakis manolis2.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)