User talk:Stone Routes
Hello, Stone Routes, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.
== Your submission at Chuckmuck (August 1 and 6) ==has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Average Wikipedian was:This submission is not adequately supported by Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified.
The Average Wikipedian (talk) 04:29, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
The reason left by Happysquirrel was:=Sourcing is much better. Please see how they should be formatted. Please organize text into organized sections (ex. etymology, history, description ...) and provide needed references.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer.
Happy Squirrel (talk) 17:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 9 August * my 60th birthday !Stone Routes (talk) 10:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC) this is for Ellie[1], the mystical beastStone Routes (talk) 01:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC) and Iona and Belinda of courseStone Routes (talk) 01:27, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Chuckmuck has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Happy Squirrel (talk) 03:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- So, after some thought, I decided that since the remaining cleanup, though necessary, was no longer as drastic and since the amount of information present was substantial, I decided to pass the article. Congratulations! I never give new articles a rating higher than C, and I rarely even go that far. In this case, your draft was a real uncut jewel. With a bit of cleanup, it is really something exceptional. With a bit more cleanup, especially wikilinking, I could see it making B-class in the near future. Keep working on it! I am still there to help if you need me. Happy editing! Happy Squirrel (talk) 03:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)Stone Routes (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Done and Dusted. It's been a tight wire and I had to do it rapid. I'm easing off now (I hope) to allow the dust to settleStone Routes (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
2020
Substantial update to lead section to summarise and give the page an accessible overview.
Approval to remove wiki warning on top on main page sought.
Also peacock term and original research issues addressed
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |