User talk:Stoneman85

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Bones Jones (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:50, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stoneman85 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account isn't use for any illegitimate purpose, it's used because I didn't have the password for my main account. The person who requested the block has no evidence it was being used in any way that contravened Wikipedia rules (it was claimed to be created to violate 3RR, despite that not being what it was used for), and I'm a little baffled by it getting blocked without such evidence. I was in fact quite open that this was the same person as my main account. Stoneman85 (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you prefer, you can consider your main account blocked for personal attacks instead. I don't see that this was a publicly declared alternate account, and its use was not covered by the legitimate uses of undeclared alternate accounts. Huon (talk) 20:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2017[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

only (talk) 01:21, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]