User talk:Stubvangen

Welcome!

Hello, Stubvangen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Daniel Ørum, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! HJMitchell You rang? 01:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Ørum

A tag has been placed on Daniel Ørum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. HJMitchell You rang? 01:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It was tagged as being about a non-notable subject; see WP:BOLP for details on what needs to establish the notability of a living subject. There were far too many red links in the original article which tells me that this person's notability was suspect and it seems other admins had the same notion since it had been deleted before. PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't simply recreate the article. You run the risk of a temporary loss of your edit privileges due to edit warring. As I pointed out, without suitable and verifiable third-party references, this individual simply is not eligible for inclusion. PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]