User talk:Studyingonline2010
Sock puppetry[edit]
Wikipedia doesn't generally allow sock puppetry, which is the use of multiple accounts by a single person. Please read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry carefully. If you are also editing as User:Everlearningonline, you must disclose that fact on your userpage and explain why you are using two accounts. I say "if" but it's clear that you are. Please don't insult anyone intelligence by claiming it's a coincidence that your first and only edits were to Draft:John Arwood. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 20:21, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect:[edit]
My intentions aren't too insult you, he's a gentlemen I found online that said he knew how to follow wikipedia's rules since they're so many and would help me. With his advice and guidance I reworded my content and he also reworded it a bit for me (a collaboration as wikipedia is intended) and yet you claim it's close paraphrasing, (it's a bio, wouldn't the background of his early life be the same? Therefore anything relatively similar to his life can be accused of "Close Paraphrasing" no?).
Everlearningonline (talk) 23:45, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Wrongful Edit[edit]
You edited my content and I know it followed Wikipedia Guidelines. Is there any actual reason you took my edits down or was it just out of spite because of some sort of discourse with "Everlearningonline". I'd like to know what edits I did that were inappropriate as I just corrected grammar and reformatted improper sentences
Studyingonline2010 (talk) 23:53, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Everlearningonline, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. theinstantmatrix (talk) 00:07, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
October 2018[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.