User talk:Stuka115

Military Air Power

A tag has been placed on Military Air Power, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Military Air Power and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. David (talk) 01:27, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Supermarine Spitfire. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. BC_{talk to me} 16:25, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Monkees, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BC_{talk to me} 23:06, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Freedom of speech. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Artichoker[talk] 02:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Monkees. La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 02:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:hello

Apology accepted, and I hope you are right.

Welcome!

Hello, Stuka115, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Artichoker[talk] 02:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:19, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. --Stuka115 (talk) 02:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Articles

FYI

Yeah, bad typing on my part but i guess if it isn't a big company it's not that important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuka115 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what makes companies notable, but I don’t think its only size, if they sell or do anything that might be special or unusual, or have had media coverage for something it might be possible. I have created article which are distinctly un-noticeable and only get like 5 hits a month... but in my experience, if your article is of good quality based on at least two or three secondary sources (not the company website), admins can't be bothered to start arguing about notability (I guess this follows the principle that the article might be unnoticeable, but does no harm).... and this can obviously not be found in any Wikipedi policy :-) --SasiSasi (talk) 15:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]