User talk:SubikshaKrishnan

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, SubikshaKrishnan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Rainbow Archer (talk) 17:15, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I Don't have much knowledge in wikipedia, I just add only single photo on my moble click.

July 2016[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, SubikshaKrishnan, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username. If you choose to do so, we ask the following:

Please be willing and able to prove your identity to Wikipedia.
Please send an e-mail to info-enwikimedia.org. Be aware that the volunteer response team that handles e-mail is indeed operated entirely by volunteers, and the reply may not be immediate.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 17:25, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 18:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subiksha Krishnan its my name then why i change my user name. Please explain

Dear Wikipedia Team, I think SpacemanSpiff is not normal. He/She continuously harsh me. I think i don't violate any wikipedia rule. I just upload only one photo and its a my own work photo. Then why SpacemanSpiff is talk too much. SubikshaKrishnan (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SubikshaKrishnan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will complaint file in Indian Cyber cell & chennai high court. SpacemanSpiff, You don't know how to behave. Indian Cyber cell trace you and find out soon SubikshaKrishnan (talk) 19:21, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

(1) Only one unblock request at a time (2) Please read WP:NOTTHEM (3) You have not addressed the reason for your block, which is plainly spelled out above. (4) We don't allow legal threats. Per WP:NLT, we don't allow legal threats. Failure to retract the threat or making further threats may result in the loss of your talk page access. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This article is the subject of a request emailed to the Volunteer Response Team (VRT).

Issues identified are: Subject has confirmed her identity for this user name.

The VRTS ticket number is 2016072410008726.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SubikshaKrishnan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Team, I already submitted my id proof via email. I don't violate any wikipedia rule and also I have no multiple account in wikipedia. I just upload only one pic its a my own work. So please remove the block as I would like to continue my small contribution to wikipedia.

Decline reason:

As you have refused to withdraw your legal threat, I am declining this unblock and have revoked access to your talk page, as you were told would happen. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

SubikshaKrishnan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16222 was submitted on Jul 26, 2016 15:03:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]