User talk:Subway NYC64

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Foreign relations of Mexico, you may be blocked from editing.

Alright Aquintero I have decided to leave Mexico alone and it’s Foreig relations article.

June 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Battlefield Earth (film). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 08:11, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Battlefield Earth (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SummerPhD^v2.0 17:16, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Okay I will stop 🛑 it now.

June 2019

Your recent editing history at Battlefield Earth (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Your changes have been reverted several times by several editors. They are disputed. If you restore them again -- in whole or in part, even if you think you have a better version now -- you will be blocked from editing. You MUST discuss the issue on the article's talk page and establish a consensus for your changes BEFORE making them. SummerPhD^v2.0 17:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:18, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Battlefield Earth (film). You are just back from a 36 hour block for pretty much this very issue. You need to discuss the issue on the article's talk page and the editors must arrive at a consenus to include the material BEFORE you can add it. If you continue otherwise, I will take the issue to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for discussion. As you seem to be completely unable to understand what the problem is, I will suggest an indefinite block, per WP:CIR.

If you do not understand what the problem is, discuss the issue on the article's talk page. SummerPhD^v2.0 00:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Okay I will stop editing Battlefield Earth. I accept everything here. I will never edit Battlefield Earth again. Just don’t block me again. I learned my lesson. User:Subway NYC64 talk 22:05, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on OBJ; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Your edits may be exempt from the edit-warring policy per point 7 of WP:3RRBLP, but as that page says,

What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Consider reporting to the BLP noticeboard instead of relying on this exemption.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

If you restore your preferred version at OBJ without first discussing the issue on the article's talk page and arriving at a consensus, you will be blocked from editing again. As you show no sign of understanding how your editing is a problem, I will push for the block to be indefinite.

If, as I expect, you soon have a similar problem at another page, I will ask that you be indefinitely blocked from editing as you seem to be either unwilling or -- IMO, more likely -- unable to work collaboratively.

If you wish to avoid this, I have one suggestion: STOP REVERTING EDITS. If someone undoes one of your edits, immediately raise the issue on the article's talk page. If no one responds after one week, restore your edit. If someone does respond, talk it out and try to reach a resolution. Good luck. - SummerPhD^v2.0 15:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Okay no more about OBJ. I will leave the article alone. Fair enough? By the way Odell Beckham Jr is now with the Cleveland Cavaliers. Go Cavaliers!!!! Just don’t block me for an indefinite period.User:Subway NYC64 talk 12:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Eurasia; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Begoon 22:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Template:MLS Cup shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SounderBruce 18:39, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Okay I will leave MLS Cup intact. I see the soccer ⚽️ 🥅 format now. Sorry 😐 about that. Just don’t block me for an indefinite period. User:Subway NYC64 talk 15:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Russian Revolution; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. RolandR (talk) 10:01, 29 August 2019 (UTC)