User talk:Sugen Kieman

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sugen Kieman, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as View source for Wikipedia:Sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TonyBallioni (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of View source for Wikipedia:Sandbox[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, View source for Wikipedia:Sandbox, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the page now but do not block the account because I am waiting for user with a break to become autoconfirmed before block. 64.237.232.32 (talk) 14:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed user[edit]

Please confirm me once I reach 10 edits without waiting 4 days to become autoconfirmed because autoconfirmation is too long. Sugen Kieman (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am asking you because autoconfirmation is user confirmation automatically. and please. confirm me. Sugen Kieman (talk) 16:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is my tenth edit! Please confirm me now. Sugen Kieman (talk) 16:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You'll just have to be patient --

Brookie :) { - like the mist - there one moment and then gone!} (Whisper...)

16:11, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am patient now. Please any steward change my user rights. I am still a newly registered user and I wanna be confirmed (or autoconfirmed if no decision) to:

- Upload media files - Move pages - Edit semi-protected pages - and more...

As extended confirmed: - Edit extended confirmed protected pages

As admin: - Delete and undelete pages - Protect and change protection levels of pages - Edit fully/template protected pages - Block and unblock users - Delete revisions of pages - View text of deleted revisions or pages - Rename files - View deleted contributions of any user - Edit pages in MediaWiki namespace - Patrol pages - Accept pending changes in pending changes protected pages - and much more...

So confirm me now! Sugen Kieman (talk) 16:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am still patient and logged in. but reply and confirm me now. I don't wanna wait until July 1, the date when i will become autoconfirmed. Sugen Kieman (talk) 16:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally logged out because of a relevant link on my history. Confirm me now. I am still newly registered; but can you PLEASE CONFIRM ME NOW!!!!. Sugen Kieman (talk) 16:45, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you block me? How did I abuse multiple accounts? Please, I really need to be unblocked. I didn't abuse multiple accounts.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sugen Kieman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't abuse multiple accounts. You must unblock me. This is wrong. This account is really a sockpuppet of User:Maleidys Perez? I hate being blocked indefinitely. I had to log out before the userblock. Sugen Kieman (talk) 17:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You certainly haven't been productive in your time here. That aside, I'm pretty sure you have been abusing multiple accounts, and my investigation is independent of the blocking admin, Widr. As such, I strongly believe the block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sugen Kieman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How did I abuse multiple accounts? You must unblock me. This is wrong. This account is really a sockpuppet of User:Maleidys Perez? I hate being blocked indefinitely.. [[Sugen Kieman (talk) 17:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)]][reply]

Decline reason:

Me believes doth protests too much. As Yamla stated below, no one at all mentioned Maleidys Perez. You gave it away. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yeap, Maleidys Perez. I find that interesting. Nobody mentioned Maleidys Perez, as far as I can see. I have revoked talk page access for this abusive sockpuppeteer. --Yamla (talk) 17:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]