Jump to content

User talk:Sujaydeo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Sujaydeo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 15:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Bmgi india (November 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 15:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Sujaydeo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 15:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BMGI (November 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 22:04, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BMGI (November 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 15:30, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:BMGI has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:BMGI. Thanks! /wia /tlk 15:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BMGI (December 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 16:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think that you are working under a misunderstanding about the issues here. Providing a link to reference six-sigma doesn't help overall. Six sigma and several other terms are jargon business speak and are often used to confuse and make something sound important. This doesn't work on Wikipedia. Either explain the terms in simple language or better still omit them completely. If the company has no notability without these buzz-words, then clearly the company has no notability. Incidentally a consultancy company does not " consult its clients" it may however provide "business consultancy services to its clients". Both phrases are weasel words in the they don't actually say what these services are but at least the second version is doing it in the right direction.  Velella  Velella Talk   10:47, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BMGI (December 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 00:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 00:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Breakthrough Management Group International. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 00:40, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On signatures

[edit]

Hey! I just wanted to let you know that you should generally place your signatures at the end of the comments like this:

This is an example comment. --~~~~

Thanks, Nathan2055talk - contribs 18:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]