User talk:Sunnyrocks31

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sunnyrocks31, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Boomerang Studios, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GSS (talk) 11:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boomerang Studios[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Boomerang Studios requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk) 11:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Codenamed bob for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Codenamed bob is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codenamed bob until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 03:12, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KuhnstylePro, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Codenamed Bob - Poster.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Codenamed Bob - Poster.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Codenamed bob, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:34, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Originally I was only going to give you a temporary block, however your edits have shown a clear intent to disrupt Wikipedia and keep the article you created, Codenamed Bob. Here are the various ways you did this:

Removing the AfD template, which was re-added.
Creating the article under a different capitalization (sans AfD template), which was merged into the existing article for AfD.
Moving the article with an AfD template to Wikipedia:Codenamed Bob, tagging that as deletion by user request, then attempting to create a new article (sans AfD template) in the mainspace.

This was all done in a very deliberate, repetitive manner, despite indications that this was not acceptable on Wikipedia, so I have to assume that you would resume this activity once the block expired. It's possible that you might be unblocked, but you'd have to really prove that you understand the reasons for your block and that you would not engage in these activities again or restore the page if it gets deleted. This does not take into consideration the concerns with potential sockpuppetry and odds are that any unblocking admin would want some sort of proof and assurance that you are not a sockpuppet. I am personally not recommending an unblock given your behavior so far. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]