User talk:Sunshinedaydreamwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Sunshinedaydreamwiki! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

File permission problem with File:Kay Lovelle Profile Photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kay Lovelle Profile Photo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kay Lovelle (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read the criteria for a person to have a biography on Wikipedia. This person doesn't seem to meet these criteria. Also, note that IMDb is not a reliable source on Wikipedia and can't be used in articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kay Lovelle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kay Lovelle, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:19, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sunshinedaydreamwiki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 10:19, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for reviewing the Kay Lovelle wiki page. This is a new venture for me and I appreciate your help.

My name is Karen Dular and I will be continuing the efforts of my colleagues in creating the Wikipedia page for Kay Lovelle. My background is technical writing, so I am looking to you for guidance in the resubmission.

Here is my first questions:

Question 1

You commented that IMDb is not a reliable source. Is it acceptable to reference Kay’s acting roles to the associated movie’s Wikipedia page instead?

Example (for her role in the movie Movie Sugar Rush): Use: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugar_Rush_(2018_TV_series) Instead of: Lovelle, Kay. "Kay Lovelle Actress". IMDB.

Before I began looking into this resubmission, I researched other Wikipedia pages that I felt were similar to Kay’s presentation and background. Can you tell me if there are any parts of these pages that are unacceptable that I should avoid? They look very similar to ours and they reference IMDb. For example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_England https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alisa_Arnah

Thanks again for your time.Sunshinedaydreamwiki (talk) 15:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! IBDb is not a reliable source, and neither is another Wikipedia page. This is because both these sites can be edited by anyone, and we need to find independent sources to base a Wikipedia page on. There are probably other Wikipedia pages which use these sources, but they shouldn't. MurielMary (talk) 00:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarifying. I understand the concern. I have discovered an IMDbPro source for the entertainment industry that I think would be considered a reliable source. This site requires a membership/verification and maintains contact information, agents, etc. for an actor. Is a reference to this site acceptable? Sunshinedaydreamwiki (talk) 12:38, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should ask the experts at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard MurielMary (talk) 08:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question 2

Kay Lovelle has been very active in veganism as and environmentalist and fashion/beauty entrepreneur. This avenue of her career was entered into as a result of her acting career and ability as an entertainment figure to reach the public. I will be adding that content with the resubmission.

For references outside of movies and television, are radio station program references and online braodcasts a valid source? Since Kay’s audience is composed of followers that rely heavily on social-media delivery, many of her presentations and speaking arrangements are internet-based (vegnews.com, veggievision.tv). Can you provide guidance on the correct inline references for these? Is it acceptable to provide the URL, internet address of these sites? Many of her interviews were broadcast on .com websites, as opposed to television.

For example, I would like to include this:

Vegan Advocacy As a vegan activist, Kay was featured in a BBC3 Documentary, “Hayley Goes Vegan,” that highlighted her work as a model for vegan fashion and organic/cruelty free beauty. As founder of the Bio Fashion Vibe, Kay is able to expose issues involving the practices of animal use in the fashion and beauty industries for her followers. Kay’s efforts to advocate for the vegan lifestyle have been highlighted in the following articles and media appearances : 

Vegan Life– Maria Slough talks to vegan icon, Kay Lovelle on the future of fashion.
 Plant Based News (Sep 16, 2018) – Artist Aims To Spread Vegan Message On Big Brother.
 VegNews (September 18, 2018) – Contestant Will “Do Veganism Justice” on New Season of Big Brother.
 MABBH (April 8, 2019) – MABBH Spotlight: Kay Lovelle
 The Vegan Society (May 10, 2019) – Paving the Way for Vegan Fashion.
 Viva – Kay Lovelle, Animal Rights Advocate and Big Brother Star, Joins Viva! Campaigns Tesco Day of Action!
 SoundCloud (Episode 12) – Model, Actress, Big Brother Contestant | Kay Lovelle Interview.
 VeggieVision TV (15 June 2019

) – We Chat with Big Brother Star, Actress and Vegan Fashion Advocate Kay Lovelle.

References

1. Vegan Life magazine – Maria Slough talks to vegan icon, Kay Lovelle on the future of fashion. Retrieved 25 June 2019.
2. Plant Based News (Sep 16, 2018) – Artist Aims To Spread Vegan Message On Big Brother.
3. VegNews (September 18, 2018) – Contestant Will “Do Veganism Justice” on New Season of Big Brother.
4. MABBH magazine (April 8, 2019) – MABBH Spotlight: Kay Lovelle
5. The Vegan Society registered charity (May 10, 2019) – Paving the Way for Vegan Fashion.
6. Viva registered charity – Kay Lovelle, Animal Rights Advocate and Big Brother Star, Joins Viva! Campaigns Tesco Day of Action! Retrieved 25 June 2019.
7. SoundCloud podcast (Episode 12) – Model, Actress, Big Brother Contestant | Kay Lovelle Interview. Retrieved 25 June 2019.
8. VeggieVision TV (15 June 2019) – We Chat with Big Brother Star, Actress and Vegan Fashion Advocate Kay Lovelle.

Thanks you again.Sunshinedaydreamwiki (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should read the Wikipedia pages about acceptable sources to get more detailed information, or ask a question on the talk page of that policy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Reliable_sources MurielMary (talk) 08:06, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question 3

My colleagues used Kay’s professional name (Kay Lovelle). Is it more credible to create a Wikipedia page using her given name (Ksenia Lavrentieva)?

Since she is known by Kay Lovelle, I think that name should be used for the entirety of the page, and just have "born Ksenia Lavrentieva" in the introductory content.

Thank you.Sunshinedaydreamwiki (talk) 15:39, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is the person Marion Worth a similar situation? See how on that page both the birth name and the professional name are listed. You can also read this page for more information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Biography#Names MurielMary (talk) 08:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your patience. I found this reference right before your reply. Sunshinedaydreamwiki (talk) 12:50, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ksenia Lavrentieva has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ksenia Lavrentieva. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:11, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ksenia Lavrentieva (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Facebook and IMDb are not valid sources - please remove these and replace with reliable sources. Also need to remove the direct links e.g. in the first two lines of the "activism" section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ksenia Lavrentieva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ksenia Lavrentieva, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 07:43, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ksenia Lavrentieva (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ksenia Lavrentieva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ksenia Lavrentieva, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ksenia Lavrentieva

Hello, Sunshinedaydreamwiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ksenia Lavrentieva".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]