Jump to content

User talk:Sup34cj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Sup34cj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 17:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

South Asia - Afghanistan

[edit]

Hello Sup34cj, the current version including Afghanistan is verified by 8 different reliable sources. Please do not change long-standing, sourced content without proper discussion at the article's talkpage Talk:South Asia, providing reliable published sources for your viewpoint. The problem with many of such regional classifications is that different organizations and sources use differing criteria in different contexts. You'll find previous discussions about this issue on article talk and in the talkpage archives. Of course you are welcome to start a new thread with additional arguments based on additional reliable published sources, but re-adding unsourced changes is not appropriate to resolve this question. As this is a recurring problem, maybe even a Request for comment might be necessary. Please read the linked information if you'd like to use this more formal (and slightly more complicated) approach instead of an informal talkpage discussion. If you have any other questions, WP:Teahouse is a good forum to ask for advice and help. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 17:59, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First of All, All South Asia Countries are British Colonies

[edit]

Afghanistan is central asia not south asia, south asia is all left hand traffic not right hand and all ruled by Great Britain. Sup34cj (talk) 18:27, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Or Just google yourself

[edit]

If you think afghanistan is south asia then show proof of ethic background and it was colonized by the british because to clarify i am asian and also i am a history major so yeah there. Sup34cj (talk) 18:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:36, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm IamNotU. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Euro, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 16:48, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Euro. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 18:08, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Euro; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. IamNotU (talk) 16:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

You've been warned about edit warring a few times already but you continue to engage in edit wars. If you continue you're probably going to be blocked. If you someone reverts one of your edits, open a discussion with that editor. I'll go ahead and open a discussion about "recess detention" at Talk:School discipline; I expect you to participate. ElKevbo (talk) 00:26, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Uber, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 21:40, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I note here, the deal hasn't closed yet and isn't expected to do so until 2021Q1. Until that time, Postmates remains a separate company. --Yamla (talk) 21:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Motion Picture Association film rating system, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Betty Logan (talk) 22:45, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh you don't have to be fooled and plus I didn't edit logged out Mrs. Know-It-All and plus you should not sweat that small stuff over the number 18 just accept that it's 17. And plus you think your the fricken Expert but your not an expert because you are saying that NC-17 is 18 you are damn Wrong so cut the crap. Sup34cj (talk) 23:15, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond at the administrator's noticeboard, not to the notice. Betty Logan (talk) 23:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello, I wanted to show you this[1], about the TfNSW acronym. You can see it under "Community engagement". I haven't seen TFNSW anywhere, so I'm going with the lowercase f.Augusthorsesdroppings10 (talk) 17:43, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]