User talk:Superflat Monogram

Aston Martin DB9[edit]

You're a new account, I suspect not a new editor, and so you should familiarize yourself with the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle. You removed a spat of useful references, along with a few nonconforming ones, and then undid my partial reversion of you without discusison. This is not acceptable. You need to slow down and articulate a reason on the talk page, and we can figure out a good way to proceed. But undoing my edits without comment, and moving on as usual doesn't work. Shadowjams (talk) 01:45, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added references. I haven't removed any references; I only removed external links that I found unnecessary. Superflat Monogram 01:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite aware of the diffs. Shadowjams (talk) 01:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So would you mind pointing out which references I removed? Superflat Monogram 01:56, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination of Aston Martin DB9[edit]

The article nominated by you was reviewed by me and is succesfully promoted to GA class. Cheers!Suri 100 (talk) 11:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated. I am, however, confused by your removal of the Reception summary from the lead. The MOS guide on Leads tells us to summarize the contents of the article, including any controversies, which I think the Reception section qualifies as. Could you explain why that information was removed? Thanks again. Superflat Monogram 14:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let that be kept, but the sentences in it like 'poor satnav' could be better explained. Suri 100 (talk) 07:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Superflat Monogram. You have new messages at Suri 100's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mountbatten Pink[edit]

Hi! I have passed the article, so well done. I look forward to more good work in the future, ★★Retro Lord ★★ 07:58, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Superflat Monogram 14:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Successful GA[edit]

Congrats on getting the article passed GA status after I did my first review. But I think it would be good if you expand the phrase "They held issue with the DB9's small rear seats and cargo space and poor satnav, however", in the lead section.Suresh 5 (talk) 11:22, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom election[edit]

You are not eligible to vote in the 2013 ArbCom elections as you have less than 150 mainspace edits; I have therefore removed your votes. On behalf of the Election Commission, Giant Snowman 21:12, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, wasn't aware I couldn't. It showed up on my watchlist, so I figured... Superflat Monogram 16:48, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]