Jump to content

User talk:Suradnik13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Suradnik13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Tone 13:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

Hi Suradnik13 - sorry for my late reply (unfortunately I may have to stop editing for a long while). As a matter of fact, the references are available at the bottom of the article Croatian intelligence community. Importantly, I would ask for you to provide references for your claims. Its a pretty big contradiction to say some agencies don't exist or have different names. ShivaeVolved 19:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plava parnjača

[edit]

Pretpostavljam da je, takva jedna ista je izložena ispred kolodvora u Beogradu, pa pretpostavljam da je ispred glavnog želj. centra SFRJ išla glavna lokomotiva. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 12:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hi ya Suradink, Uploaded these to wiki commons, never done that before so I am not sure if all is 100% correct as it should be.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Mala_R2_M_underwater_craft.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Bell_206_and_RBS_15_mobile_Launcher.jpg http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:800px-Croatian_Army_RBS_15_SSM.jpg

you'll need to upload these images to Wiki Commons Croatian military as I am not familiar with the Wiki Commons much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.86.95 (talk) 20:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the undo on Croation Navy. I wasn't paying enough attention.Vrefron (talk) 23:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ščitarjevo / Šćitarjevo

[edit]

Na Talk:Ščitarjevo sam ostavio dokaze o verziji sa Č. Ako ne nađeš poštene dokaze o tome da se mjesto piše sa Ć, vratit ću tvoje premještanje. Admiral Norton (talk) 22:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zagreb task force

[edit]

Projekt je konačno pokrenut! --Admiral Norton (talk) 21:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ma mislio sam staviti plavu, ali bi se onda grb slabo vidio. Admiral Norton (talk) 12:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request to move article Zagreb mayoral elections, 2005 incomplete

[edit]

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Zagreb mayoral elections, 2005 to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

  1. Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
  2. Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved. This can easily be accomplished by adding {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there.
  3. Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 00:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Census designated place

[edit]

Ne znam to prevesti na hrvatski, ali to je bilo koje mjesto koje nema mjesnu samoupravu nego je izmišljeno samo u svrhu popisa stanovništva. Mjesni odbori nemaju veze s naseljima, ako pogledaš [1] vidjet ćeš da se ne podudaraju s naseljima, a što se naselja tiče, mislim da je blesavo tražiti da nešto sa 62 stanovnika ima gradonačelnika, općinski sud, itd. Admiral Norton (talk) 18:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okej, uvjerio si me. Što se Aquariusa tiče, vidjet ću da li mogu, pa ću ti javiti. Admiral Norton (talk) 18:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Vidio sam već, ali nisam siguran hoću li stići na to. Admiral Norton (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

Whether it was a part of Serbia or not, is not relevant really.

The Serb people (who gave two Presidents of the parliament for a quarter of a century) lived in Dalmatia and voted. Their script and language were recognized in the Triune Kingdom.

Do you beg to differ? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 12:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, its a pretty relevant.
I don't see connection between Serbs and serbian language in article about Parliament of Dalmatia. I don't see serbain language in the article about US Congress, but Milorad Blagojević, who is also Serb, was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives. --Suradnik13 (talk) 15:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
However, you've got some holes in your analogy over there. The United States of America are not a country in which "Croatian and Serbian" languages were declared equal, and with national schools teaching Serbian in Knin's hinterland and the Bay of Kotor and Croatian in most of the remainder (in many the language locally officially sanctioned as "Croatian and Serbian", nor is Rod Blagojevic a representative of the Serb people, or a Serb at all - but an American of Serbian descent.
Refer to the decision of the Parliament of Croatia from 1867 regarding the Serbs, as well as the resolutions in the "Policy of the New Course" adopted in the beginning of the 20th century. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 13:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]