Jump to content

User talk:Surfdachsie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Surfdachsie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as How Strategy Shapes Structure, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sailsbystars (talk contribs  email) 16:59, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article How Strategy Shapes Structure has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An article.... about an article? Not seeing any credible claims to notability.....

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sailsbystars (talk contribs  email) 16:59, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite following why you said "There is nothing promotional about the wikipedia article you have deleted...". While we do delete articles for that reason, that wasn't the reason it was deleted. The article was deleted because someone questioned whether the article adequately asserted notability, and no one objected tot he proposed deletion.
I have restored it. However, I agree that there are concerns about Notability. One of the key sentences in that guidelines states:
If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject...
The article has three references, one of which is to the article itself, so obviously not independent of the subject. The second is not independent of the subject. The third may be, but isn't obviously coverage of the subject. I'm telling you this so that you can look for independent coverage if it exists. If it does not, and the article is listed as a candidate for deletion, it may not survive (The deletion decision I implemented was a different process, and can be overturned by something as simple as you asking for it to be restored. In contrast, if there is a consensus to delete in an AfD process, and that would be likely, it is much more difficult to restore.)--SPhilbrickT 22:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SPhilbrick, This is all a bit new to me. If an article is published by a third party independent of the authors, why do I need to cite notation? You mean if someone decides to quote the article? But the article is a free standing published document by itself...? I will try to find a quote but I don't really understand why. Please explain. Thanks, Katrina

Nomination of How Strategy Shapes Structure for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article How Strategy Shapes Structure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How Strategy Shapes Structure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Drmies (talk) 18:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]