User talk:Surfer273

January 2009[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Palestinian territories. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 13:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did not add commentary as you claim, but did a minor edit. It is incorrect to call the Occupied Palestinian Territories the Palestinian Territories since they are occupied by the Israeli military. (Surfer273 (talk) 20:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Palestinian territories. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 20:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I'm new to Wikipedia. If this is the talk page, I would like to know why the OPT is referred to as PT. This is not only clearly wrong, but actually misleads the public. --Surfer273 (talk) 21:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page is Talk:Palestinian territories. Please raise your concerns there. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 21:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks for the crash course --Surfer273 (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ismail Haniyeh audio link[edit]

The link you added here is broken? -- Kendrick7^talk 02:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]