User talk:SusanLesch/Archive 46

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

congratulations on feminism making it to Good Article

Congratulations on helping feminism becoming a Good Article. I wish I could have done more. I'm glad y'all did it. Nick Levinson (talk) 17:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, Nick. I'm sure you know how hard Cailil worked on it! -SusanLesch (talk) 18:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

An award for you!

Mind the Gap Award
I, SarahStierch, hereby award you, SusanLesch, with the Mind the Gap award for your excellent work pertaining to women's history and feminism on Wikipedia. Thank you for your hard work at succeeding to make Feminism a good article! Congratulations and thanks for all you do.
Thank you, Sarah. Happy to see you awarded this to Cailil who did almost all of the work! -SusanLesch (talk) 18:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

image in Kotok-McCarthy

I'm just wondering, why did you remove the image in Kotok-McCarthy? It seemed good to me. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:30, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Bubba73, thank you. I restored it just now. If you can improve the file description, go ahead. Somebody had one or two images from Alan Kotok marked for later deletion. I was just afraid they would do that with this one and didn't think of a solution until you asked. (It works just fine to have two non-free use rationales.) -SusanLesch (talk) 21:59, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, I think what you did was right. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for The Relaxation Response

Orlady (talk) 00:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Academy of Achievement

Hello Susan, I've very recently been engaged by the Academy of Achievement to see if I can help resolve the ongoing issues related to their Wikipedia article, with which you've been involved recently. Based on my review of recent developments, it seems the version prior to November was much too promotional; however, I'm concerned that the version following your edits has now gone too far in the other direction. Indeed, the EduCap material is only tangentially related to the Academy; while I believe a reference to the controversy is not unwarranted, I believe the current article has become a "coatrack".

In hopes of obtaining a speedy resolution to the issue, I've prepared and proposed a new version of the article which is carefully researched and aims to be neutral. I hope it can be an acceptable compromise or, at least, a starting point toward one. I've asked other recently involved editors to look at the draft and discuss the matter on the article's Talk page, and I'd like to seek your input as well. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 18:38, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: Brahmavihara

Hi. The article on Buddhism is far from being a featured article, and if you take a look at the archives, we've had lots of issues to deal with over the years. At this point, the article needs a rewrite with an attention to significant detail like the Brahmavihara. It would be helpful if you could help contribute to this process. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 06:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: Comments

Based on your past contributions, I can't think of anyone more qualified than you to write it.
Very funny.

I was seriously referring to your recent work on articles such as The Relaxation Response, List of sanghas in San Diego County, California, Buddhism and Hinduism, Hara hachi bu and other articles. Viriditas (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Oh. You were serious! Thank you very much. Just beginner's luck maybe. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:42, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Minneapolis article

Susan, the first paragraph in the "Religeon & Charity" section of the Minneapolis article is very hard to read. The formatting may "not match the rest of the article", but it is clear and easy to distinguish. If you don't like what I did, then please find a way to make that paragraph more readable. Next, there is not a competition between different things to remove, so your comment on the fact thath the Ordo would "lose a tossup" on which to remove is completely nonsensical. Wikipedia policy clearly states that notability must be established for inclusion. The Ordo has evidently done so, since it has its own article, and so I left that there. If and when the Athiest group mentioned establishes notability according to established proceedure, then by all means, include them. Thanks. SeanNovack (talk) 14:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

SeanNovack, if the whole article was written in one-sentence paragraphs it would be a disaster. Thus I will continue to revert your formatting changes. Regarding your omission, nobody says notability has to be established for every mention in Wikipedia. Otherwise why not wikilink every word? I'm sorry but I don't find your deletion to be helpful, or in line with representing every point of view. Also sorry if you find the article hard to read but its format stood up to years of review by other readers. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:32, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
My apologies. In the past we were able to work issues out on this page (note: the relpy you left today was for the last issue we debated, not this one) and I hoped we could work this out here. Feel free to remove this discussion if you would prefer it not be on your userpage. SeanNovack (talk) 15:33, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
This Barnstar is awarded to SusanLesch for her excellent work on the subject of Buddhism. Viriditas (talk) 03:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Wow, thank you, Viriditas. -SusanLesch (talk) 13:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed compromise for Academy of Achievement

Hi Susan, I know you had said you were done with the Academy of Achievement Talk page, but my latest suggestion builds on one of your previous paragraphs and, since the conversation has progressed a bit, I'd like to invite back editors who were involved previously. If you can add to the discussion, please do. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Têtes Noires, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blondie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Têtes Noires

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit-a-thon at Hennepin County Library

Minneapolis History edit-a-thon

The Minnesota Wikipedia community and local historians are invited to edit entries in Wikipedia on Minneapolis history. Please help increase the depth of information on Minneapolis history topics by utilizing materials in the Minneapolis Collection. Find your own Minneapolis History topics to edit or work from a list developed by Special Collections Librarians.

Where: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
When: Saturday, February 25, 2012, 10-5 pm
10 am - 11 am Orientation to Minneapolis Collection
11 am - 5 pm Edit-a-thon
Website: Hennepin County Library, Special Collections, Map & Directions
Parking: Metered street parking or pay ramp in basement, enter on 4th Ave

For more information see Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Minnesota#2012. —innotata 00:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Steve Hagen

The DYK project (nominate) 00:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiWomen's History Month and Lisa Randall

Lisa Randall would be a good project for Wikipedia:WikiWomen's History Month. There are other ideas on the latter's talk page, including a link to a to-do list and a list of less-well-known women. GraniteStateGrump (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:First Avenue-7th St Entry.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:First Avenue-7th St Entry.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:40, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Doe v. Shurtleff DYK

The hook referred to an Oregon statute being upheld, but the article said Utah. I just had to change this while it was on the Main Page. This is very basic, yet didn't come up at all in your otherwise lengthy review of the hook.

Not getting on (ahem) your case, just pointing it out so you can be a better reviewer of DYK hooks in the future. Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm not planning to ever review a court case again, unless there is some press coverage for sources. -SusanLesch (talk) 22:39, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Also Daniel Case, you might notify the author of the hook. -SusanLesch (talk) 04:41, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Easily confused Buddhist representations

Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Sōji-ji

The DYK project (nominate) 08:32, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Edward Espe Brown

Hello! Your submission of Edward Espe Brown at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:01, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
I'm seeing some lovely contributions coming from yourself. Keep up the great work Susan and being an asset to DYK! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Wow. Thank you so much. It was nice to "meet" you today. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:46, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Likewise. I see you edit Buddhism articles, or was Eihei-ji a one off? Mine have mainly been Tibet related but I'm proud of getting Sera Monastery to GA and starting articles on its hermitages! Unlike my good friend User:John Hill though I haven;t been to Tibet myself.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:59, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Sera Monastery is a beautiful article. Thank you for the pointer. If you ever try for FA (and, say, post a note at Wikiproject Buddhism) maybe I can review it. Never been to Tibet but the Dalai Lama is expected to visit here (San Diego) in about two weeks. I started in on Sōji-ji because my teacher is Sōtō. Metta. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Well I don't know about FA, its very tough! Wow you have a Zen Buddhist teacher. Amazing. Do they teach you meditation and the works?Mahamuni Buddha Temple, Paro Taktsang, Punakha Dzong are other Buddhism related GAs I can think of I've written which might interest you. I'm especially intrigued by Bhutan! Unfortunately my long term collaborator Nvvchar is no longer with us. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Good grief! Nvvchar had 505 DYKs. Paro Taktsang looks breathtakingly beautiful. All I remember about Bhutan is the happiness survey and something on CBS 60 Minutes. No idea what to expect from a teacher. I just asked him recently after expanding his Wikipedia bio. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
If ever you want an article reviewed for GA let me know Susan.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:08, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Eihei-ji

Orlady (talk) 16:02, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Edward Espe Brown

Orlady (talk) 16:02, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Brian McFadden move

FWIW, I disgree with your move. However if you are going to move BMcF, you might at least consider constructing a disambiguation page rather than leaving the vacated page a redirect, otherwise the move is pointless. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:41, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Tagishsimon. Thank you for the suggestion. I can try to make a disambiguation page sometime. As it stands, priority goes to the singer. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
What then was the purpose of your move? What has it achieved? If the singer is primary, why was the article moved? --Tagishsimon (talk) 17:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Another notable individual with the same name belongs in Wikipedia. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:59, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Brian McFadden is now a disambiguation page instead of a redirect to the singer. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:00, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Mmm. We're still not on the same wavelength. My understanding is that if there is a primary article (cf. "priority goes to the singer") then that article gets the unmodified title, Foo, and the dab page is entitled Foo (disambiguation). Only where there is no primary topic would the dab page get the Foo title. See the example for Rice at Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Deciding_to_disambiguate. So in this case, by my reading, we would have three articles:
--Tagishsimon (talk) 16:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Tagishsimon, you are welcome to rearrange these pages any way you like. I'm completely done with this topic. I can see now that my addition of "(singer)" didn't help anything, and disagree that "priority goes to the singer" (just because his career started first?). You are welcome to change what I did to anything that you want. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
"priority goes to the singer" is a quote from your post, above. So now you don't agree with yourself? Very odd. I'm not minded to clean up your mess in this instance. The bottom line is that you have not followed wikipedia guidelines on disambiguations, and have left a stinking great mess in the form of a hundred or so now misdirected links at Special:WhatLinksHere/Brian_McFadden. (Previously these successfull got the reader to the desired article on the singer. now they just take the reader to a dab page) Having started, I think it is incumbent on you to finish. "I'm completely done with this topic" doesn't cut it. It would help if you showed any appreciation of your error. --Tagishsimon (talk) 15:29, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Tagishsimon, you are the person who wrote "you might at least consider constructing a disambiguation page". Which I did. So I'm done. By the way, I don't plan to reply again here. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:38, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

So. You take no responsibility for breaking a barrel-full of links. Good work. Way to improve the encyclopedia. --Tagishsimon (talk) 15:42, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Meditation aid: , Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 20:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for William Bodiford

The Bushranger One ping only 08:44, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Hōkoku-ji

Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Wonderful job again!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. It looks like a nice place to live (only kidding but I'll be moving soon).-SusanLesch (talk) 01:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

50 DYK

The 50 DYK Nomination Medal
Thank you for expanding our knowledge of historical people, educational Women in America, The Relaxation Response, poetry in a bamboo garden - just lovely reading (my relaxed response) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:02, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, Gerda Arendt! I have enjoyed your works at DYK. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bev Forsman

The article Bev Forsman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent reliable references in the article or could be found. Being a Zen teacher is not inherently notable. All information in the article comes from the one ref and according to the refs policy,

Most biographies are submitted by the individual the biography depicts."

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 05:50, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Bgwhite, thank you for catching this. I marked it db-author and blanked the page. User:Malik Shabazz deleted it the same day. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Great American Wiknic for Twin Cities in June

Howdy! I would like to invite you to again join the Great American Wiknic this June (maybe just update Wikipedia:Meetup/Minnesota ?) :) Also, please add any preliminary details to Wikipedia:Wiknic#2012 Wiknic.--Pharos (talk) 18:40, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Pharos, thanks for the invitation. Unfortunately I won't be in Minneapolis at that time. -SusanLesch (talk) 02:37, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Please check the correct grammar usage on the Donna Summer article.

I believe you erred in your correction to the article.

The proper usage, if not mistaken, should be "was". The actual service is what is being referred to. If you remove the "exact location" and "time", the "service" would still stand at "was".

Sorry to add more, but the change was through a direct quote on Essence' website.

Cheers.

--Allamericanbear (talk) 22:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome to change it back. The Gregg Reference Manual says to disregard "intervening phrases and clauses" which means to my ear, "The exact location and time were kept secret." -SusanLesch (talk) 22:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm not quite following you. What it is means to your ear doesn't tell me if it's grammatically correct or incorrect. According to my ear it sounded incorrect, and I asked for you to check my request, I may have been wrong, and actually welcome someone showing me the proper wording.
Although I've changed it back, I'm sitting here asking myself if you've actually told me to revert an error on my part.
I apologize if I'm more apt to writing and understanding in more simplistic ways of putting things, but I feel the request still has not been answered. If your correction was correct, I'm at least smart enough to learn from it and remember to use the proper grammar if I come across a similar situation.
Sorry to make this whole thing sound like a mountain over a molehill. It's just seeming like so many entries lately have been made without explaining details, something that I thought "verifiable" references should solve.
I hope you're not finding offence to my pressing the matter. It's not my intention to be that way.
--Allamericanbear (talk) 18:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
You asked me to check it which I did. My source says my edit was correct. You and Essence may disagree which is fine with me, and the reason I said to change it back if you wish. Best wishes. -SusanLesch (talk) 01:46, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Darwin and Gender

If you've not already noticed it, the Darwin and Gender project may interest you. Harvard Project #2 has links to one essay and to other related pages, Henrietta’s diary is relevant to the topic. . . dave souza, talk 12:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at Sigmund Freud that might interest you

Hello, SusanLesch. Since you have in the past taken part in discussions at Sigmund Freud over what material is appropriate for the lead, I thought I'd notify you that there is currently a dispute about that subject at the talk page. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 03:36, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured portal review/Weather

This portal could use some improvement, see above discussion for some suggestions on things to work on, any help you could give in contributing to the efforts to maintain its quality rating would be most appreciated. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 01:50, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


Great American Wiknic

In the area? You're invited to the Great American Wiknic.

Place: near Minnehaha Falls at Minnehaha Park, Minneapolis
Date: Saturday, July 7, 2012 (rain date July 8)
Time: 12–3 pm

  • Accessible from the Minnehaha Park light rail station, bus, walk, bike, or car
  • If driving, free parking available at 46th Ave. S, and pay parking in the park
  • Food and drink options nearby, or bring your own... maybe even to share!

See the meetup talk page for more. —innotata 23:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

ITN

Sources have been added to the Battle of Gao nomination. Can you reconsider your !vote? Bzweebl (talk • contribs) 18:20, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Paul McCartney FAC

The Paul McCartney article has now been thoroughly copyedited top-to-bottom by numerous editors including User:Lfstevens, who is a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. If you can find the time in your busy schedule, please consider stopping by and taking a look, and hopefully, !voting. ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 03:46, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Good work!

Hi, and thanks for your many and varied contributions to WP. Much appreciated! I wonder if you would care to look at the GSK page again please and offer a comment there to help move the discussion forward. Thanks, john

Non-free rationale for File:Maud Hart Lovelace.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Maud Hart Lovelace.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Denkoroku

Good edits on the Denkoroku. Could you give your opinion on Kensho? I'm having quite a difference of opinion with one editor. Take also a look at the history and the talk page. Thanks. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 07:05, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

You can count my support. WP:OWN is the right diagnosis, sir. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. Can you put the page on your watchlist? Joshua Jonathan (talk) 02:45, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Done. Good luck. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Denkoroku

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Great! Joshua Jonathan (talk) 08:17, 2 October 2012 (UTC)


Wikipedia Loves Libraries event

In the area? You are invited to Wikipedia Loves Libraries in Minneapolis.

Hennepin County Library's Special Collections is hosting a Minneapolis history editathon on November 3. Help increase the depth of information on Minneapolis history topics by using materials in the Minneapolis Collection. Find your own topics to edit or work from a list developed by Special Collections librarians.

There will also be an intro for people new to Wikipedia, and tours of Special Collections.

Where: Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis
Special Collections (4th floor)
When: 10am-4:30pm, Saturday, November 3, 2012

For more info and to sign up (not required), see the meetup talk page. —innotata 13:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, Innotata. I would be happy to attend but unfortunately have a previous engagement on November 3. -SusanLesch (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi SusanLesch! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 00:59, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, Sarah for the invitation. I don't expect to participate. Just letting you know now. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:03, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Sōji-ji

Hi, Susan. I have been working a bit on Sōji-ji, which you wrote, mainly adding links, macrons and doing other minor stuff like that. I visited the temple yesterday and came back with good material, so I plan to expand it.

I think however that most if not all of the "Food and Cooking" section should go because manifestly non neutral, non encyclopedic and out of place.

Quote from Wikipedia's own MOS: Prefer nonjudgmental language. A neutral point of view neither sympathizes with nor disparages its subject (or what reliable sources say about the subject), although this must sometimes be balanced against clarity.

I doubt that the fact the cook has the "intention to please those who will eat them" is relevant. Any cook wants to please.

Expressions like "using all of each ingredient with gratitude for it." are hardly neutral. In any case, Zen food and cooking are matters that do not concern only Sōji-ji and should therefore be treated elsewhere. Text that could be of interest, like Dōgen's three objectives of cooking, would be better used on Dōgen's page.

Before deleting the section I wanted however to discuss the issue with you, who penned those words. Can I proceed? --Frank (Urashima Tarō) (talk) 22:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, you should proceed. No need to ask me. -SusanLesch (talk) 03:27, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Third opinion

Hi Susan. Could you give your opinion at Talk:Sherry Chayat#Hear-say emails? Greetings, Joshua Jonathan (talk) 20:34, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Is Buddhism a religion

Hi Susan, Glad to see that you are taking an interest in this topic. FYI, I've gathered some more sources on the topic here (User:Dorje108/Buddhism_and_religion_sources) in case you are interested in developing this further. Best regards, Dorje108 (talk) 23:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi Dorje108. I really am not interested. I was just adding the names of museums to captions when I found a whole bunch of hidden text. Hope it helped to make it visible. Best wishes. -SusanLesch (talk) 03:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Brands

Hello, SusanLesch.

You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:33, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Darwin & Gender resources

"The Darwin Correspondence Project is proud to announce the release of a major set of online resources aimed at students and researchers of the History of Science, Gender History and Gender Studies. The Darwin & Gender resources are the culmination of a two-year research initiative funded by the Bonita Trust and led by Dr. Philippa Hardman." Dunno if you're involved in this, but if not you may find the resources interesting. . dave souza, talk 20:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Patrick J. Hanratty

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

First Glasgow Wiki Meetup

You are invited to the first ever Glasgow Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Sir John Moore, 260-292 Argyle Street, City of Glasgow G2 8QW on Sunday 12 May 2013 from 1.00 pm. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Scottish topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

San Diego Comic-Con International meetup proposal

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/LA/SDCC1. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:15, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Records for humans?

How come you want to count age records "for humans" only? Don't we separate between the sexes for athletic records, too? Or would you support throwing top male 100 metre times and top female 100 metre times together in one list, thus eliminating all female? I hope not. --bender235 (talk) 06:35, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

It's not a bad idea. Thank you for responding where this discussion belongs, In The News and not here. Best wishes, -SusanLesch (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
I did respond there, but the discussion was closed. Unfortunately. Anyways, I hope you back off of that crazy idea of throwing male and female athletics records (or age records, for that matter) together. --bender235 (talk) 16:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

MNopedia

Hi Susan, Thanks for contacting us at MNopedia. MNopedia made an editorial decision early on to use a bibliography rather than in-line citation, since that's how encyclopedias traditionally cited their sources. We hope that our entries' bibliographies will be a useful starting place for Wikipedians. Mhsrc (talk) 20:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Mhsrc. I replied in in place. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 01:27, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Lafayette Park Historic District DYK

Thanks for approving it. What, exactly, did you find "lazy" about the citing (not upset or anything, just want to know for quality control purposes)? Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Not to worry. I think you can do a better job of sourcing, with an inline citation for the hook fact. If not one, then three. Instead this led me to look up each of the three people individually. It was probably my fault for choosing the ALT hook. Best wishes, -20:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Daniel, I went back to look at your article again. The same problem presents itself. In the lead you mention all three people in your hook. I think if you had given inline citations right there, we'd not be discussing this. Hope this helps. -SusanLesch (talk) 23:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
You're right—at the time I began the article, I was scattered between three or four other different things, hadn't been able to develop the article to the extent I usually do so I was really trying to make sure I nominated it in time (often late noms get accepted, but every so often I get a reviewer who doesn't cut me a break on that) and wasn't as focused on the fact that the hook facts need to be sourced if it's in the intro. Thank you. I'll fix that now. Daniel Case (talk) 13:42, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I guess one could say I was too "lazy" to bother to ask you to fix that before okaying it. But I figured by now you must know every rule inside out. How many DYKs have you done? -SusanLesch (talk) 14:30, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Assuming that's not a rhetorical question, 500+. Don't worry ... I would have fixed it if you'd pointed it out. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SusanLesch/Archive_46&oldid=1142792475"