User talk:Sustainablequeen

This is Sustainablequeen's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahemur Rahman (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rahemur Rahman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sustainablequeen! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jamiebuba,

Thank you for your feedback! New to wikipedia writing but really enjoying it so far. I've just sent a message to the Teahouse as you suggested. Thank you so much.

Best Wishes,

SQ Sustainablequeen (talk) 12:26, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am curious as to how you are picking the subjects of your edits. 331dot (talk) 13:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have a big interest in fashion and specifically in sustainable fashion. I've recognised that there are some other fashion figures that have been undocumented on Wikipedia so I thought, let me give it a go! Really enjoying it so far. Sustainablequeen (talk) 13:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. While you are under no obligation to follow the advice I'm about to give- I would suggest that you focus on getting one draft accepted before you create and submit more- otherwise you might be recreating the same issues that one draft has in others, which you wouldn't necessarily be aware of. 331dot (talk) 13:43, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey 331dot, you're right there! I shall do that. Sustainablequeen (talk) 13:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Mower (MBE) (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This person is probably notable given the MBE, but the sources provided don't seem to have significant coverage of her or why her work is important, such as where her advocacy was influential or significant.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarah Mower (MBE) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 13:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thank you for the feedback. I will amend with further references. Sustainablequeen (talk) 14:01, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many of your edits have been about the British Fashion Council or its events, are you affiliated with the Council? 331dot (talk) 14:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 331dot, no I am not affiliated with the council. The edits made in relation to this article about the council have been edited to be clearer after accumulating the secondary references. Sustainablequeen (talk) 14:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. 331dot (talk) 14:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Sustainablequeen (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahemur Rahman has been accepted

Rahemur Rahman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

echidnaLives - talk - edits 03:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarah Mower (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by VickKiang was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for the article. The subject appears to be a well-known journalist and author who has won awards including the MBE (note: references supporting this needs to be in independent reliable sources, not non-independent profiles or pieces Mower herself wrote). However, the author notability criteria or the basic biographical notability guideline is not demonstrated through the draft's references, which appear to be non-independent profiles and articles Mower wrote, or routine announcements, interview (which might not be a secondary sources), or fairly short announcements without a byline. Please add more references that are reliable, independent, secondary, and non-trivial, or alternatively references that show that WP:NAUTHOR is passed. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sarah Mower and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

VickKiang (talk) 03:47, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Priya Ahluwalia (fashion designer)

Hello, Sustainablequeen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Priya Ahluwalia (fashion designer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sarah Mower

Hello, Sustainablequeen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sarah Mower, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Priya Ahluwalia (fashion designer)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Priya Ahluwalia (fashion designer) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Sustainablequeen. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Sustainablequeen, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]