User talk:Swag ChannelYT

March 2017[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Cyclone Enawo. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. We do not use F13 values, they are not a reliable source. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 00:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2016 Atlantic hurricane season has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2016 Atlantic hurricane season was changed by Swag ChannelYT (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.868488 on 2017-03-10T03:21:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop messing around[edit]

Consider this a warning. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia. If you keep making it clear that you are not here to help us build one, you will be blocked from editing. In particular, please refrain from editing MarioProtIV's userpage (per Wikipedia:Userpages), inserting false intensity estimates (as you did here), editing others' comments (per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines), or otherwise behaving disruptively.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:29, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have changed storm intensity, damage totals, and added random nonsense. That is not productive to editing an encyclopedia. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 04:15, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Swag ChannelYT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17814 was submitted on Mar 19, 2017 04:40:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When can I be unblocked[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swag ChannelYT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So I joined Wikipedia a couple weeks ago and I got a warning every week. One day later I got blocked. I'm just a beginner in Wikipedia and I don't know how to edit or make an encyclopedia. Swag ChannelYT (talk) 19:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A lack of experience is no excuse for putting words into another editor's mouth or for faking numbers. Huon (talk) 00:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

When can I be unblocked?[edit]

I joined Wikipedia 17 days ago and I got a warning every week until block. I am a beginner in Wikipedia and I don't know how to edit or make an encyclopedia. Here is the reason why I was blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swag ChannelYT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not here to contribute to the encyclopedia Swag ChannelYT (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 23:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swag ChannelYT (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not here to contribute to the encyclopedia Swag ChannelYT (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 23:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.