User talk:Bobby lee swagger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Swaggaofficial)

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Swaggaofficial, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Swaggaofficial, good luck, and have fun. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in User:Swaggaofficial/sandbox, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically, bold face is reserved almost exclusively for the name(s) of the article topic in the lead section. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:MUSICBIO / WP:NMUSICIAN - lacks any independent verifiable secondary sources. Social media websites such as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Spotify and Twitter are not acceptable or reliable sources/references. The individual's website is a primary source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Swaggaofficial! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Swaggaofficial. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page User:Swaggaofficial/sandbox, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Nathan2055talk - contribs 04:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Information icon

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to User:Swaggaofficial/sandbox, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Swaggaofficial, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Swaggaofficial|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Fiddle Faddle 07:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I am sorry for late response I am not a paid editor I am new to wikipedia and still learning thanks. Bobby lee swagger (talk) 02:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akaya (September 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akaya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Akaya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Fiddle Faddle 07:31, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akaya (September 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please indicate how this musician has charted and provide external news sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akaya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Akaya, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Swaggaofficial (talk) 20:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

can you please give an example of what you mean? all of the other turkish rappers does not have any chart records? do you mean I need to provide a news about the artist from newspaper or news channel? give me an example so I can understand better I am new to this.

What you Need[edit]

Hello Swaggaofficial,

I am going to give you some tips.

1. First, and most important is to sign all your messages, here and wherever else you use it. You sign things by putting this ~~~~

2. They are asking you for special sources - secondary sources. This means you have to find some websites where they comment on Akaya's work. You find some websites where they say his songs are different, they say his rap is good, this is a new direction, a new wave, like this. Where they say Akaya is starting something new. Don't put his songs, don't put lists of his music, find other sites where other people say things about him.

So, you try here

And you try here

And you try this one too

and then if that does not help you, you try "Alpaslan Kaya" + turkish rapper + Akaya in all the different search engines.

Be sure to link to information, critique, assessment, commentary about Akaya, not his stuff directly.

One other thing. These need to be of some substance, not just one sentence that mentions his name. It has to be something that goes on and talks about what he has done for a few sentences. For example, it has to be a significant mention.

Cheers, Hope this helps you. Whiteguru (talk) 06:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. You have not answered this twice now. This is not a question yiu may ignore Fiddle Faddle 19:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am not a paid wikipedia editor. I am new to this and trying to learn at the same time if I made something wrong and would like to advise me to fix please do. thanks. Bobby lee swagger (talk) 02:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That declaration is all that was needed. Fiddle Faddle 18:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akaya (October 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Statement Needed[edit]

Hi,

you need to post a statement on this page that you have no connection to Akaya, and you have not been paid for this article. This is an important step. If you are connected, and have been paid, then you need to write about this here. (This is called Conflict of Interest and is an important policy. It does not mean your article will fail on account of this. The policy requires that you disclose any connection. ) Thank you. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bobby lee swagger: Sorted and moved to mainspace. Please study WP:REFBOMB and apply some discretion in your future articles. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akaya for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Keivan.fTalk 21:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Help on getting my article approved. (transcluded from Whiteguru's Talk Page)[edit]

Hey, I already made the statement that I am not a paid editor. you can see this on my talk page

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. You have not answered this twice now. This is not a question yiu may ignore Fiddle Faddle 19:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


Hello, I am not a paid wikipedia editor. I am new to this and trying to learn at the same time if I made something wrong and would like to advise me to fix please do. thanks. Bobby lee swagger (talk) 02:20, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. That declaration is all that was needed. Fiddle Faddle 18:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

can you please tell me what else need done to get approved. Bobby lee swagger (talk) 03:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorted and moved to mainspace. Please study WP:REFBOMB and apply some discretion in your future articles. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Can you please help! Someone post it this for my article. This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. I checked the reasons they put; I do not see any legitimate reasons. They are just guessing. Please let me know what to do since you are the person who approve this article. Thanks in advance. Bobby lee swagger (talk) 22:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bobby lee swagger: Please provide a link to the page. I will take a look and see if I can provide an explanation, help you understand. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, thanks for replying quickly. they are saying links are probably not independent well how do they know? if they are saying probably it means they are not sure. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akaya Bobby lee swagger (talk) 22:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bobby lee swagger: The article has been nominated by another editor for deletion. Which is allowed. At this link, other editors will give an evaluation. It will be done in terms of this policy WP:NMUSIC, which you should study and understand. You have to meet the principles outlined there. So you are having to wait and see what the other editors say. In the meantime, if you find more independent reviews of this musician, you may add them to the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 23:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru Thank you so much for your input I found so many turkish stubs that has broken links and only 1 or 2 references that already passed and not under considered for deletion. I was able to find ascap repertory links of his songs.

would this work? Ace Repertory links below

https://www.ascap.com/repertory#/ace/search/workID/910069110

https://www.ascap.com/repertory#/ace/search/workID/908991647

https://www.ascap.com/repertory#/ace/search/workID/908991725

https://www.ascap.com/repertory#/ace/search/workID/909431731

https://www.ascap.com/repertory#/ace/search/workID/910069100

The other Turkish Stubs that has no reliable sources below what's funny about those stubs that Keivan.f is the person who contributes those and some of them have broken links and Keivan.f don't seem to be bothered.

the links are below please check.

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sansar_Salvo

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayki

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luciano_(rap%C3%A7i)

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eno

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aga_B

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidra_(rap%C3%A7i)

https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilal_Sonses Bobby lee swagger (talk) 17:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Whiteguru You never get back to me about my above message. "Keivan" has deleted my article now what do i do? can I re-create it? he he helps other people and pass their articles even tho they don't have reliable sources. can i report the pages he approved that has no reliable sources? can I re-create it and can you approve again? please let me know what to do I have been working on more articles now I am scared they will delete my articles all the time. Bobby lee swagger (talk) 03:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 

Hello Bobby lee swagger, I have a message for you, and, I have moved all this material to your talk page, where it belongs.

  1. I don't want this on my talk page
  2. I personally don't approve any article, I am simply a new page reviewer, and I make recommendations on new pages I review
  3. Any article that does not meet the requirements given for WP:BASIC, WP:NOTABLILITY and WP:MUSIC is open to nomination for deletion
  4. You are allowed to go to the deletion article and give explanation; you are also allowed to go to the deletion article and notify that you have put more references
  5. You cannot attack any editor for nominating an article for deletion
  7. You cannot go and find their articles and criticise them nor attack them for their own work
  8. What you can do is read the links given to Wikipedia Policy, especially the policy on references and try to find robust references for your articles
  9. You should not stop editing nor creating of new articles just because you have a deletion. Go back and keep trying.
  10. I wish you the best, if you wish to reply, reply here and use the reply code {{reply to|Whiteguru}} and do not post on my user page. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 23:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note also that the Turkish Wikipedia might have different notability guidelines than the English one. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bobby_lee_swagger&oldid=1043850505"