User talk:Switfoot

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Switfoot, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Switfoot, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Switfoot[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Switfoot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:26, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hot Pod[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hot Pod, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 16:37, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicholas Quah[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicholas Quah, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 16:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicholas Quah for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicholas Quah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Quah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 17:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hot Pod for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hot Pod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Pod until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 17:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hi @Switfoot:, I am a fellow new editor and just wanted to say that I saw your post in the Teahouse and thought it was interesting. I agree that Wikipedia's podcast coverage could use more work. I found this project: Wikipedia:WikiProject Podcasting that you may find useful. It looks like there are some active members there at least.

Your article on Dolly Parton's America was interesting to me too. However, I think the claim that it influenced Heartstrings needs a citation. I wasn't able to find one with a quick search, which is unfortunate because the page for the show is getting a lot of views recently. If you can find a source, it may be a good addition to the Heartstrings article as well.

Anyway, thanks for contributing! And best of luck to you with your future edits. :) -KathrynJZ (talk) 18:47, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the Heartstrings citation. When I was doing research for that initially I read something on a source that I found on google, but didn't cite it for some reason. Now I've gone back and it comes from a NYTimes story about Parton. ^[1] Will update. Switfoot (talk) 19:32, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Switfoot: Thanks for the link! I checked it out, and here's the quote I think you were looking at: "She’s the subject of a popular serialized podcast (WNYC’s “Dolly Parton’s America,” hosted by Radiolab’s Jad Abumrad), the inspiration for a forthcoming Netflix anthology series (“Dolly Parton’s Heartstrings,” premiering Nov. 22), and the featured vocalist on an EDM song". I don't think there's a clear connection that the podcast inspired the series, just that they're happening at the same time. Sorry to go on about it, I don't mean to be rude or anything, I just think it's interesting stuff too. :) Have a good one! -KathrynJZ (talk) 19:52, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I am misreading it, then. No offense taken. Feel free to correct. Switfoot (talk) 20:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/21/arts/music/dolly-parton.html

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Krantz (November 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Wild Thing (podcast). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This should merge with Wild Thing (podcast) or vice versa as her only "notable" work

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laura Krantz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Laura Krantz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Switfoot! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Switfoot! You created a thread called New to editing articles. Could use some friendly advice at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Laura Krantz concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Laura Krantz, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Laura Krantz[edit]

Hello, Switfoot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laura Krantz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Laura Krantz[edit]

Hello, Switfoot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laura Krantz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing closed discussion at Talk:Ivermectin[edit]

Please do not add comments to closed discussions. There is a process for challenging a close that should be used instead. See Wikipedia:Closing_discussions#Challenging_a_closure.— Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 23:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Krantz[edit]

Hi Switfoot. I've reverted your edit at Laura Krantz because it was the biography of a living person without any reliable source. My recommendation is to create a draft or use your sandbox before adding content to the mainspace. Isabelle ^🏳‍🌈 16:38, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks. I wrote up an entire entry for Krantz with citations, but it got deleted while pressing publish because of the existing redirect (I'm clearly doing something wrong). Luckily I'd copied the original text so it wasn't lost, but all the sources were removed. I published with the intention of adding the sources back in, but the article was removed before I could add the citations back. What is a better way to do this, since the redirect seems to make it impossible for me to create a new entry? Switfoot (talk) 16:42, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/21/arts/music/dolly-parton.html

[1]