User talk:Sylphs of the Seashore

This is Sylphs of the Seashore's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Next, Please (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://allpoetry.com/Next,-Please, https://allpoetry.com/ticket/add. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Next, Please may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sylphs of the Seashore! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 19:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Next, Please (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Poem Analysis is not a reliable source and need multiple reliable sources that have written in-depth about the poem. I suggest checking Google Books (ex. this). Then you should summarize in your own words what the sources say about the poem. You can use limited quotes, like a sentence, attributed to the person making the statement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Next, Please and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guidance

Hi Sylphs of the Seashore, first thank you for removing the copyright violation which I am sure was not intentional. Wikipedia has a very strict view on copyrights unlike many sites on the internet. I took a look at other existing articles about his poems and, honestly, most of them are very poor and, as written and sourced, would not pass today's standards. However, I suggest taking a look at An Arundel Tomb. While you do not need to write something that extensive, it does provide a good outline. You just need a couple or so quality sources that have written in-depth about the poem and from a brief look at Google Books, it appear several sources are available. If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 21:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Okay, I will look into the things you've mentioned. Thanks for your guidance. Sylphs of the Seashore (talk) 08:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Next, Please

Hello, Sylphs of the Seashore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Next, Please, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]