User talk:Synoman Barris/Archive 5
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
I wasn't going to mention it, but
Re your non-admin close. You may not be aware that there was 10 years ago something of a possible racial undercurrent to the reaction of some editors to Asian names, which was in some cases, 10 years ago, stronger than the reaction to, say, Lech Wałęsa as an East European name. I'm not going to be the one that might speculate why 10 years ago some editors found Mỹ Linh more problematic than Édith Piaf, but there you go, they did. It could have nothing to do with Mỹ Linh being Asian and Édith Piaf being European, there could be other reasons. But either way the prospect of not making a racial distinction was for me at least component on why we resolved the issue by treating Asian and Westerners the same as far as Latin font names goes. That was 2009-10. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- In ictu oculi, Thanks for letting me know. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:25, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Synoman_Barris-NPP_certificate-154169.jpg/220px-Synoman_Barris-NPP_certificate-154169.jpg)
It took a lot of work, time and effort. It wasn't easy - you did what needed to be done and did it well - and now you can apply to be a new page reviewer. Atsme Talk 📧 22:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Atsme, Thank you! The certification looks very beautiful, gonna copy this to my user-page. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 23:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Atsme, And I also made a request at WP:RFP/NPR Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 01:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I had composed my response, but when I hit save, there was an edit conflict with your response, so mine follows yours. Atsme Talk 📧 01:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
RE: Siege of Baghdad
Good day,
Thank you for the message re: the change in article the Siege of Baghdad (812–813).
The reason I thought to make the change is that the initial caption just said that al-amin was playing chess (portraying it as historical fact). the source cited for that claim in the page (https://archive.aramcoworld.com/issue/200904/the.game.of.kings.htm) Clearly mentions it's aprocryphal nature "... his son al-Amin (died 813), figures in an apocryphal chess tale..".
It seemed to me that clarifying that this story is in fact aprocryphal would provide the reader with a more accurate view of the material and more consistent with the sources cited.
Best regards
152.11.170.162 (talk) 18:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Done and
Reverted Thanks for clarifications. Regards Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 18:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you very much for the welcome!
152.11.170.162 (talk) 18:58, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
For your light speed anti vandalism works Felchy McAnaljizz (talk) 17:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC) |
Offersaki Thanks for this Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:42, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg/80px-Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg.png)
Hi Synoman Barris. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Salvio 10:58, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Salvio giuliano, Thank you Salvio! Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
About List of rulers of Boer - "Can a redirect be necessary here?"
@Synoman Barris and 李瞬生: Hi Megan and user whose family name is Li. To my understanding the issue you raise is that the State President of the South African Republic article - the South African Republic does not include State President of the Orange Free State of the Orange Free State. Is that correct? That said, in my opinion "List of rulers of Boer" is an implausible WP:REDIRECT to this or any similar topics. Please do feel free to disagree. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
- Shirt58, Hi, after evaluation of the article, I am inclined to agree (that’s why I reverted my messages on your talk). The article is copy pasted from two Wikipedia articles, stated above. I had reinstated the CSD. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:10, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Synoman_Barris-NPP_certificate-154169.jpg/220px-Synoman_Barris-NPP_certificate-154169.jpg)
It took a lot of work, time and effort. It wasn't easy - you did what needed to be done and did it well - and now you can apply to be a new page reviewer. Atsme Talk 📧 22:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Atsme, Thank you! The certification looks very beautiful, gonna copy this to my user-page. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 23:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Atsme, And I also made a request at WP:RFP/NPR Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 01:18, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I had composed my response, but when I hit save, there was an edit conflict with your response, so mine follows yours. Atsme Talk 📧 01:36, 17 August 2020 (UTC)