User talk:Szzuk

LoP in UK

Hi there, I have a suggestion. Could we add a little introduction for each section in the list with a few details about significant parkruns in that area that have a WP:RS? I'm thinking something like: [Insert parkrun name here] was set up in [date] and has a record attendance of [number]. The parkrun takes in 3 scenic laps of the hills of [somewhere] and starts and finishes at the [something]. The parkrun was the first to be set up in Scotland and has been very popular since.

This is only a suggestion and that explanation could be a little different, but I think it might be good to do this just to expand the list a bit. Regards, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 16:09, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is a good idea. There used to be a longer introduction to each section that mentioned the size of the area covered and population. It was kind of boring and when someone deleted it I didn't undo it. Szzuk (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Ricca on WikiCommons

I'm contacting you because you voted delete on the article on Tony Ricca. Over on the Commons there are a number of photos, one of which was used in a draft here that was speedily deleted under C4. I therefore believe all the photos there need to be deleted. I have nominated all of them, but Georgivac (who was banned from Wikipedia for socking) is still insisting on the commons that he is notable. I need help with delete votes. The Commons pictures are these; [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] and [8]. 2001:8003:5999:6D00:B5DD:CEDF:C253:4630 (talk) 21:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Russia: War, Peace and Diplomacy

The article Russia: War, Peace and Diplomacy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is almost exclusively a summary of the book, with disproportionate weight given to analysis and summary of one chapter. Only two third-party sources that discuss the book, and only one is related to the book - the other is an article that cites this book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. creffett (talk) 02:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Szzuk

Thank you for creating Russia: War, Peace and Diplomacy.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article, but note that other editors have noted its excessive detail. It is not necessary to summarize the entire book, and you may even have spoilers that would discourage someone from buying it.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Szzuk! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Recreational walks in Lancashire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Recreational walks in Lancashire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recreational walks in Lancashire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 01:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Parkruns in the United Kingdom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Parkruns in the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Parkruns in the United Kingdom (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hobit (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Parkruns in the United States of America for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Parkruns in the United States of America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Parkruns in the United States of America (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Parkrun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Parkrun, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parkrun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uday Foundation

Hi, Uday Foundation page was published on June 22, 2015, Somehow, it was redirected to Rahul Verma in 2018. I have created a fresh draft Draft:Uday_Foundation and submitted it for review. It shows that there is a severe backlog for fresh article for submission. Also I tried to write in fresh words. May I request you to please review the same if possible? Thanks Shibanihk (talk) 15:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]