User talk:T.taylor1997

T.taylor1997, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi T.taylor1997! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, T.taylor1997, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mjroots (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you're still relatively new here and have ruffled a few feathers. Please take the time to read the linked pages in the welcome notice above. They will give you an idea of what Wikipedia is and is not. Mistakes are fine, as long as they are learnt from, so don't worry too much about the block. Another important thing for you to remember is WP:3RR and WP:BRD - the D part is most important. Editors are usually willing to discuss things where there is a difference of opinion and you are encouraged to join in these discussions. Any questions, please ask, either ping me ({{ping|Mjroots}}) or ask on my talk page once your block expires. Mjroots (talk) 17:40, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

.

Bet you didn't block the others for doing the exact same as me. T.taylor1997 (talk) 18:28, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If any other editors have edit warred (and I'm not seeing any evidence they have, at least at Cannock railway station) then they will also be blocked if they continue to do so after warnings. When your block expires, you can present any evidence of edit warring by others at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, but please read all the advice and instructions first, particularly noting that your own behaviour will be examined alongside that of the editor you are reporting. Thryduulf (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus

Re your message at my talk page. I'll let the insult fly - one develops a thick skin as an admin and such insults are often a sign that one is doing the job properly. I'm not disputing the veracity of what you added, but Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and works on a WP:CONSENSUS of editors. With the info you were adding, it appears that the consensus is that it is not includable. Your editing was clearly done in good faith and that is not why you were blocked. You were blocked for edit warring. As I said above, it's not a big deal if you learn from it. Mjroots (talk) 12:00, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/T.taylor1997. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 15:36, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

T.taylor1997 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

See WP:LITTLESISTER. As literally all edits by that other account overlap with edits you have made with this account, and given the admitted relationship between the two accounts, they will be treated as one. Sockpuppetry is established. Yamla (talk) 00:32, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the only account I use, I believe my sister uses wikipedia from this computer thus I can see why you believe theres this sock puppet thing going on, but your belief is inaccurate and is causing an inconvenience to her. But i do not have access to her account. T.taylor1997 (talk) 23:39, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

to further the last response

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

T.taylor1997 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My appeal states I have no access to her account. May I also ask what this other account is please, I have no other account on this site. Furthermore, I am baffled that you have not contacted me prior to blocking as suggested by Wikipedia. A quick conversation would have ironed this out and i would have been easily been able to inform you this without all the drama. It is entirely possible for more than one person to share a single computer and have fully private accounts. T.taylor1997 (talk) 00:51, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Two accounts editing the same articles from the same device(s) are, as far as we are concerned, an abuse of multiple accounts. We do not care whether there are two people actually using the computer, as that is impossible to prove either way: all we know is that this account and User:75 bluesara were editing the same pages from the same computer/phone in close temporal proximity. That, as far as Wikipedia is concerned, is an abuse of multiple accounts. The existence or otherwise of your sister is a moot point, per this longstanding Arbitration ruling. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:11, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

T.taylor1997 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Don't worry, got a new account since you guys are being (Personal attack removed) about this. Managed to get around the IP block too T.taylor1997 (talk) 11:09, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Bye. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you have chosen to evade your block, there is nothing else to discuss, and a checkuser will close this. 331dot (talk) 11:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]