User talk:TJ994

Welcome!

Hello, TJ994, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco (talk) 09:51, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mark David Chapman, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mark David Chapman was changed by TJ994 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926733 on 2011-06-29T12:09:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:09, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wolf ticket, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. AKS (talk) 15:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Mikemoral. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Michelle Obama, because to me it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks, —Mike moral ♪♫ 22:59, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at President of the United States with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mathonius (talk) 23:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do not link to unrelated Facebook pages as you did on Worth School and Michelle Obama. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:02, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant links[edit]

I saw those edits you made to Iron Man 3. Stop inserting irrelevant links!! I don't know who this person is, so there's no point linking their Facebook profile to pages that have nothing to do with it. Boushenheiser (talk) 23:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at President of the United States ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 23:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:John Lewis-Stempel photo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:John Lewis-Stempel photo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:54, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Bondax, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Katieh5584 (talk) 16:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bondax with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 16:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Un-Man, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 13:06, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]