User talk:TKRoman

Spam in StoryBoard Quick

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on StoryBoard Quick, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because StoryBoard Quick is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting StoryBoard Quick, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Adding information to the page to show the validity of posting this software on Wikipedia. The significance of the software not only rests in its pioneer status in the vertical market of filmmaking software /storyboarding software but it opened the field for non-artists to vizualize and show to the world what they see in their head as far as stories are concerned. Some educators call it "a great equalizer" because it helps give people who are creative -but not skilled in drawing or drawing on the computer- the opportunity to participate in showing their story ideas. It takes the focus off the drawing skills and puts it onto the shot creation, story and story flow.--TKRoman (talk) 00:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of StoryBoard Quick

I have nominated StoryBoard Quick, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StoryBoard Quick. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gmatsuda (talk) 10:55, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your input on my new page, but just to clarify, I don't work with the company and have nothing to gain out from creating this page except to start getting experience in contributing what I know to Wikipedia. I'm a user of the software and realize it's historical signifigance in the realm of filmmaking software. I've been looking to write an article for a long time and this is a subject I know about. I feel I've left my personal opinion out of the article and see no just reason why it should be deleted.--TKRoman (talk) 21:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC)