User talk:TPogliani

This is TPogliani's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carlalberto Guglielminotti (December 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carlalberto Guglielminotti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 08:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TPogliani! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 08:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Hello TPogliani. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:NHOA Group, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TPogliani. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TPogliani|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TPogliani you need to do this on your user page, not the article page. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 15:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eejit43, Dear Eejit43, thank you very much for your suggestion. I have just updated my user page according to your recommendation. Please let me know if any information or modifications are needed on the article. TPogliani (talk) 15:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for declaring! The article needs a lot of work for it to be ready for mainspace, there are a lot of claims that aren't backed up by reliable sources, it reads like and advertisement, and notability isn't proven. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 15:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eejit43, Many thanks for you help. Could you please help me in understanding how I can modify my contribution to adhere to Wikipedia's policies? Maybe could you provide me with a few examples of how to properly modify/cancel this information? many thanks. Terry TPogliani (talk) 10:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Practically the entirety of the "Business Units" section is filled with unnecessary information and promotional wording, such at robust, push the boundaries, and many more. See WP:PUFF for more information. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 12:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NHOA Group (February 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NHOA Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your feedback. I disclosed a conflict of interest by choosing "I’m writing about myself, or a close person/subject" during the initial account registration. As actually I am currently an employee of NHOA Group, I proceeded to insert on the page as you suggested the disclosure {{paid|user=TPogliani|employer= NHOA Group}}.

This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Title of your draft.

However I'm probably making some errors in the prosses as it appears that I did not used the right template.

I hope this can help to proceed with my request on behalf of my employer NHOA Group. The energy sector is broadly represented on Wikipedia and we are an innovative and fast growing part of it. For this reason, we think that from an encyclopedic point of view the absence of a dedicated page may be a shortcoming. A more and more wide audience is seeking credible information and solutions on energy transition. Being recognized in the industry for our purposeful commitment to research and innovation, our request is to open our sustainable business model and our know how to a passionate and reliable community like Wikipedia.

Hoping you can take into consideration my submission, many thanks again for your help in correctly proceeding with the submission of this page.

Best regards,

Teresa Pogliani TPogliani (talk) 09:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]