User talk:T B Pereira

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, T B Pereira, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

TheRingess 08:41, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Puerto Rico[edit]

Hi. I see you have edited the Puerto Rico article and I see you have a keen interest in Lusitan heritage. I welcome you to bring your knowledge over to the Puerto Rico WikiProject and contribute there. Maybe you could write an article on Lusitan inmigration/influence on Puerto Rico. See you around. Fell free to contact me at my talk page. Joelito 14:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Is there a place of picadores at Portuguese bullfighting? If there is one please add some information on this in the article Bullfighting. Best regards. Behemoth 18:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lusitano Transmontano, please know that I am not trying to flame anything. I supplied some important contributions to the article, especially about Spanish-style bullfighting and my effort is only to keep this article as an exemplary one. I can agree with you that Portuguese bullfighting is neglected and the sections of the article should be improved in regard to Portuguese bullfighting. But I think this should be done in a "decent" way, within the entirety of the article. For example, the horses part was an important one for I know that Portuguese bullfighting is conceived largely as an equestrian event. However, as I mentioned before, it was only about horse breeds, etc. If I had the access to necessary information, I would volunteer for improvement of the part about equestrian nature of Portuguese bullfighting. I did not mean to omit this aspect but mine was merely a concern for the sake of the article. Best Regards. Behemoth 18:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please tell me what do you think of these recent edits? [1] Also, can you recommend me some good info sites on Portuguese bullfighting, preferrably in English but may also be in French or German. You see, I don't know that much about Portuguese bullfighting. I watched one long ago on TV but I can hardly remember the details. Thanks in advance. Behemoth 14:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Now, everything is much more confusing. Portuguese section in the article used to be merely a copy & paste from the Rancho Cardoso website, a situation that did not make sense. I wished that with newer edits it would be clarified but what happened is the contrary. At a Portuguese bullfight, there are riders, bandarilheiros, forcados, matadores and also (as this website claims [2]) picadoros. I came to think that Portuguese bullfighting does have no rules and conventions at all! Can you please tell me how many types of different events are collectively named as corrida in Portugal? Also, let's begin with the name of the final act (I also began to have a doubt whether it is the final act, after I learned about the bandarilha "estocada" of matadores); is it pega de touros, pega de cara(s) or is the act itself also properly named forcados? Ciao! Behemoth 18:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi From Ranch Cardoso[edit]

Hello, I am the Webmistress and owner of Ranch Cardoso.... Bloodless Bullfighting Horses and Bloodless Bullfights in California, Portuguese Style.

I've been reading a few of your dialogues and found it very interesting. I am going to start a whole new section on Wikipedia just for Portuguese Style bullfighting as I agree that it should be on its own. It will be under "Bloodless Bullfighting" as that is what it is. Although the California version is just a tad different from the one in mainland Portugal.

I too am trying to do a lot of research and documenting as much information I can get as to the real deal of Portuguese style bullfighting. The big difference is that in the Classic Spanish style bullfighting, the end result is the bull actually getting killed. There is no kill in Portuguese style, especially in California.

On our website, you will see videos of Cavaleiros, Matadors, Forcados, and Ganadarias.... and images too. I try to convey the message via the videos because it is so much easier rather than trying to commentate on an event.

Our site is purely to promote and increase the awareness of Portuguese Style Bloodless bullfights, as well as our beautiful bullfighting horses. Most of the time, when someone talks about horses, it's usually relating to a race horse, dressage, show horse, etc, etc.... anything else other than a bullfighting horse. What's sad is that if anyone gets wind of a bullfighting horse, they only refer to them as the horse being used by the picadors in a Spanish style bullfights. These are the guys who poke at the bulls and will sometimes get knocked down by the bulls too.

Anyways, I'd love it if you can contribute and help out with these articles and would love to finally have a more definitive description for our website as well.

Let me know what you guys think. Here is our website.... http://ranchcardoso.biz and our forum is http://ranchcardoso.biz/rcForum/

I would love more people's input as I feel that other's views are so important as well.

You can send me an email here.... webmistress@ranchcardoso.biz

Take care! --Webmistress Diva 03:37, 6 June 2006 (UTC) Bloodless Bullfighting @ Ranch Cardoso[reply]

Hello Again[edit]

I started the article for Bloodless Bullfighting, but someone wrote that it needs to be wikified and I need to follow a certain guideline.

I never had to do that before. Can you or someone help me put it the way it's suppose to be.

Thanks a million! --Webmistress Diva 05:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image copyright problem with Image:CARMEN MIRANDA.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:CARMEN MIRANDA.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 11:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Os Lusíadas[edit]

I translated the portuguese article of the Lusiads, but it seems that some parts aren't very neutral. If you can (and want to), give it a look and make ir more neutral. Cheers. Obrigado.

WikiProject Portugal[edit]

We'd appreciate if you had the time to join and help out Wikipedia:WikiProject Portugal. Portugal articles are in serious need of avaliation, updating and improving.--Saoshyant talk / contribs (I don't like Wikipedophiles) 17:09, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- - - -

Sorry Saoshyant, this comes late but I don't have much time and even if I did I don't have the patience or temperament for Wikipedia. I need my own website, and for me contributing to Wikipedia has become a waste of time. I don't like that many people here with their phoniness and maybe I am a little arrogant when I say this but I think many are pseudo-intellectuals who lack good logic and are full of ulterior motives even when they seem straight laced - as opposed to "Wikipedophiles" who are disruptive but at least with them you can tell right away. They use Wiki rules the way sleazy lawyers use procedure to win in court and the last thing I need is for some Wiki-stupid ass to bang the gavel without a trial and makes bold and arrogant undoes and edits as if they are the judge and the jury. I especially won't tolerate this on articles that I start. I can write them for myself and put them on my own real estate where they will be safe from these bozos. But good luck to you anyway.

- Lusitano Transmontano 03:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Notice

The file File:Ibn-dana.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]