User talk:Taghrid.ahd

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Taghrid.ahd/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Taghrid.ahd/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Taghrid.ahd! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:14, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your positive words of encouragement TheSandDoctor for this new user. I believe that the article creation flag was not on purpose. I instructed this editor to paste edit suggestions into the sandbox, so I could assist while the editor is learning Wikipedia formatting and editing. The next step will be to insert the sentences and citations into the relevant articles. Should we remove the above messages? Thanks again for your help!JenOttawa (talk) 02:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Taghrid.ahd! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 23:21, Thursday, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Copy and paste

You added

"the intramuscular route with 20 µg RV is significantly more effective compared with the intradermal route with 2 µg RV, as the standard schedule compared with a rapid schedule and deltoid intramuscular injection compared with the gluteal intramuscular injection"

Ref says

"The intramuscular route with 20 microg RV was significantly more effective compared with the intradermal route with 2 microg RV as was the standard schedule compared with a rapid schedule and deltoid intramuscular injection compared with the gluteal intramuscular injection"

Cochrane reviews are copyrighted. We CANNOT copy and paste from them unfortunately. Please make sure you paraphrase going forwards. Also if you are interested in helping with translation we would love that aswell :-) Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:33, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Doc JamesThank you for the note, and my apologies for this incovinience. Regarding translation, I am interested. What do you recommend as a start? Regards, Taghrid.ahd (talk) 18:47, 2 March 2018 (UTC)