User talk:Tajiksexycheap

October 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Northern Alliance, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Northern Alliance was changed by Tajiksexycheap (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966752 on 2011-10-28T20:00:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ahmad Shah Massoud with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:02, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Ahmad Shah Massoud with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:06, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Ahmad Shah Massoud

related diff
hello, i am just telling u ppl what is true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tajiksexycheap (talk • contribs) 20:08, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

No, you are not stating truth - Instead you are adding your own opinion about a subject to the article. This is against WP:NPOV and WP:BIO - any added content must be neutral in tone and sourced, which, in this case, clearly isn't the case. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)