User talk:Talelevel

Welcome!

Hello, Talelevel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Mulavallikvu Thrikarthika. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Silvester (talk) 00:09, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

As I already explained in the edit summary, all of that content has nothing to do with the primary topic (Kabyle people). Not that is matters in this case, but you also added unreliable sources (tamurth, avavanonsense, etc.) that shouldn't be near anywhere near an encyclopedia. If you think that the irrelevant content belongs in the article, then you make a case for it on the article's talk page and seek consensus for its inclusion. M.Bitton (talk) 16:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, informations concern kabyle people, its talk about wildfires of 2021 in kabylia like Arouch in 2001 after the death of Massinissa Guermah. All sources are reliable (Reuters, Challenge, Courrier international, Jeune Afrique, Tamurt (regional medias). What is the reasons to delete its ? Talelevel (talk) 16:47, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Noname JR per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Noname JR. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]