User talk:Tammi95

{{helpme}} I am a newbie. Another editor recently said I had a "meat puppet agenda" and used "weasel words." Where can I find definitions of these words in Wikipedia? Is there a glossary? Thank you, Tammi95 (talk) 18:26, 26 July 2009 (UTC)Tammi95[reply]

Yes, at WP:GLOSSARY. However, both of those are covered in more detail at WP:MEAT and WP:WEASEL. I should warn you it wasn't meant as a compliment. :-( Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Tammi95! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gimme danger (talk) 03:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Dare Wright Biorgraphy Section

Writers have lives. Children's book writers have lives. The lives of anyone of note contains tragedies and contradictions. Roald Dahl for example wrote Willy Wonka etc. and still had tragedy and controversy in his life. I add background to Dare Wright because she was human, y'all! H-u-m-a-n. And because Wikipedia is about documenting all of a person not just the nicey-nice parts. Like Dahl's section on controversy I use the one published biography of Wright that has alot of documentation. I feel we owe her and Wikipedia readers that. Tammi95 (talk) 15:24, 12 January 2011 (UTC) P.S. Even JFK's section has documentations of his affairs as well as his good deeds. H-u-m-a-n. Is there a Wikipedia term for someone who keeps editing sections to make people saints? Tammi95 (talk) 15:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Lonely Doll Controversy

Okay, y'all. According to Wikipedia, "Meatpuppetry is the use of editors as proxies to sway consensus. While Wikipedia assumes good faith, especially for new users." I am a fairly new user, I like people to tell the whole story. There is no consensus here to sway. Facts are facts. And Lonely Doll like its author has its documented controversy. This is interesting. This is fact. So let us stop name-calling and embrace the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Tammi95 (talk) 15:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Lonely Doll Controversy, Part II

I have repeatedly inserted this controversy section only to have it deleted for reasons that I cannot fathom unless it is done by someone with something to gain by deleting it. Thus I call on Wikipedia precedent in other entries about popular and/or award-winning children's story/picture books in which a controversy section is included: In the Night Kitchen by Maurice Sendak and The Lorax by Dr. Suess. Here are Wikipedia entries for Children's Books where controversy is mentioned in text: And Tango Makes Three by Peter Parnell and The Story of Ferdinand by Munro Leaf. The historical and cultural contexts in which these books were published and, yes, reissued are part of their stories. And that includes The Lonely Doll.