User talk:Tapasyaasingh

This is Tapasyaasingh's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: HS Anasuya Kulkarni (December 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aviram7 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

more reliable source needed, currently source are have insufficient WP:SIGCOV and please bear in your mind only reliable source about this subjects, who clearly indicates the notability of that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HS Anasuya Kulkarni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:14, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tapasyaasingh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 05:14, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HS Anasuya Kulkarni (January 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see what Wikipedia is not.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:HS Anasuya Kulkarni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

User4edits (talk) 05:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your relation with HS Anasuya Kulkarni[edit]

Hello, Tapasyaasingh. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:HS Anasuya Kulkarni, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You seem to be a student of the individual concerned, and doing promotion. User4edits (talk) 13:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See your edit Thanks, User4edits (talk) 13:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:HS Anasuya Kulkarni has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:HS Anasuya Kulkarni. Thanks! User4edits (talk) 06:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can reply to my comment here as to what exactly is notability of the individual? Also please clarify your relation and COI with the individual, if any. Thank you, User4edits (talk) 06:58, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The individual is known to be a well known vocalist during the 1950s to 1970s. She later was the first one and the only one to introduce an Indonesian musical instrument called Angklung to the Indian concert stage. Her name is registered in Limca Book of records for this. She is the only one to play Indian Music on the Angklung. She also recently received the Sangeet Natak Academy Amrit Award for her contribution to the field of music in India.

I am her senior most student, learning to play the Angklung since the last 15years. HS Anasuya is 89yo and does not understand new age technology. She doesn't understand what is Wikipedia, she doesn't know what it means to be on it, she doesn't care. Being her student, I feel she deserves an article on Wikipedia. No one is paying me for this, I'm writing this with my own will. Tapasyaasingh (talk) 09:51, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tapasya,

Thank you for your reply. Can you please see WP:NARTIST and provide me with reliable sources covering significatly about how and why this individual is notable ? Thanks, . User4edits (talk) 13:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Here are a few sources to prove notability and significant coverage of the individual.

https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/embracing-world-music-595223.html

https://bengaluru.citizenmatters.in/543-anasuya-kulkarni-17560

https://www.thehindu.com/features/friday-review/music/anasuya-kulkarni-recital-review/article7035866.ece

https://www.newindianexpress.com/magazine/2012/Jul/21/cartographer-of-music---389222.html

https://www.mumsandstories.com/2017/07/26/music-beyond-boundaries-by-dr-anasuya-kulkarni/

https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/dr-anasuya-kulkarni-musical-instruments/articleshow/32026990.cms?

From the notability guidelines, the individual shall fit the following:

1. The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors; or

2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique; 106.51.169.210 (talk) 16:17, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you so much for taking the effort. However,

>nor is she widely cited by peers or successors

>nor has she originated any new concept or theory as most notable sources you listed (national media) lists her as a collector (and player) of various instruments.

As,

WP:NARTIST is not fulfilled, and

there is not any WP:SIGCOV, and

the article is written like a news feature, and

you have a significant WP:COI in promoting this article's presence on Wikipedia (not necessarily monetary value)

I am rejecting this submission. I would encourage you to contribute to Wikipedia, and not be disheartened.

Also, thank you for reading and disclosing your COI.

Thank you, User4edits (talk) 16:51, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HS Anasuya Kulkarni (January 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by User4edits was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: as per comments therein, and discussion at the submitter's talk page.

User4edits (talk) 16:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]