User talk:Tara Mirling

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Tara Mirling, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me my talk page. Again, welcome! Toddst1 (talk) 14:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liberal Logic is an oxymoron by Tara Mirling[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, your article Liberal Logic is an oxymoron by Tara Mirling is not appropriate for Wikipedia and I've nominated it for speedy deletion. Wikipedia is not a place to write opinion pieces; we carry factual articles written from a neutral point of view. Have a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopaedia. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 08:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tara Mirling[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Tara Mirling, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of User:Tara Mirling and leave a note on [[Talk:User:Tara Mirling|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Orange Mike | Talk 13:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]