User talk:Tashe8694

Welcome!

Hello, Tashe8694, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 20:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Ashe

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tom Ashe, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 20:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tashe8694! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 674 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Tom Ashe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 15:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tom Ashe has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/pages/Thomas-M-Ashe/164885040469?ref=ts (matching the regex rule \bfacebook\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:05, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not re-add the copyright violation image, and do not re-add the facebook link. See WP:EL. Woogee (talk) 02:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas M. Ashe, you will be blocked from editing. Woogee (talk) 02:56, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Thomas M. Ashe

An article that you have been involved in editing, Thomas M. Ashe, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas M. Ashe. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woogee (talk) 02:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Thomas M. Ashe, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 02:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:7632 192621585469 164885040469 4305752 7981051 n.jpg

Besides the fact that the file title is meaningless, you must provide evidence that you have the right to the copyright of the image. Woogee (talk) 02:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas M. Ashe

A tag has been placed on Thomas M. Ashe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 21:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. E Wing (talk) 21:21, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Thomas M. Ashe. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GregJackP (talk) 21:54, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recreation of an article which was deleted following a 7-day deletion discussion is vandalism. This article will be deleted because it is a recreated article. If you think that the deletion was improper, the proper procedure is to list the article at WP:DRV. However, under the notability guideline at WP:POLITICIAN, he doesn't qualify. Woogee (talk) 21:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas M. Ashe

I noted the hangon tag you placed on this article and the material you left on its associated talk page. I'm sorry, but this article has failed an articles for deletion process within the past month. You can find a record of this process at WP:AfD/Thomas M. Ashe. The material I saw and deleted did not either assert or contain notability and in fact was pretty much the same as the material that failed at AfD. My understanding is that you or someone else has recently recreated the same material at Tom Ashe. Responding to (and agreeing with) a note on the talk page, I have made it impossible for this article to be recreated without the consent of an administrator. Pretty much your only option at this point, should you choose to pursue this issue further, is to go to deletion review; I'll just make you aware in advance that deletion review is 100% based on whether or not an article meets specific Wikipedia policies and no other arguments are likely to be useful. Best of luck with your future contributions. Accounting4Taste:talk 02:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]