User talk:Tatepa

November 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hang Nadim have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hang Nadim was changed by Tatepa (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871645 on 2022-11-16T09:24:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:24, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Hang Nadim. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 10:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hang Nadim, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 11:09, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist: What do you mean by disruptive edits when I provide reliable sources? did you even open the sources? And try to compare it to your rollback edit. I'm here tryna improve the article. (Tatepa (talk) 11:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Please use edit summaries[edit]

Using edit summaries should reduce misunderstandings and wp:rollbacks
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed a recent edit you made does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Adakiko (talk) 11:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, sorry I didn't know that I have to write summary everytime I make edit, will do it next time! Thanks for reminder! (Tatepa (talk) 11:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Eiskrahablo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eiskrahablo. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Mz7 (talk) 06:50, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]