User talk:Tboned208
Say Hello
[edit]Hi there. Welcome. I know that Wikipedia can seem pretty confusing at first, so please come and say hello for some help to get you started. (Note - you might want to RIGHT click on that, and open in in a new tab or something - and when you get there, please wait a few minutes for a reply) Chzz ► 22:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Hi, Tboned208. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck! Chzz ► 22:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
![]()
Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page. There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia! -- Chzz ► 22:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
|
A reply to your email and a warning
[edit]Hi, removing sourced and verifiable content with your own unsourced materiel, or own research, is not acceptable. All content should be well sourced (read WP:SOURCE). Especially when that material contains things such as "Knocking out people who write lies about the club on Wikipedia", and you would appear to have a conflict of interest, which may prevent you from writing in a unbiased, clear way which shows all sides to the argument. Also, I presume that you were the IP address that I previously reverted, which added "who ever keeps writing this crap is going to get a foot stuck up their ass", this is unacceptable, and not in the style of this encyclopedia. In answer to your other question, no I did not originally add the content. - Kingpin13 (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- It's great that you're willing to learn about our policies, and that you want to help. One of the most important things is, like I already said, that all information is verifiable. So if you "know" something, even if it's true, you must give it a reliable, secondary source. - Kingpin13 (talk) 14:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- I guess it's okay to remove dubious unsourced content, but I better approach would be to tag it with {{FACT}} for a week or so, and remove it if it's still unsourced after that. You may also want to check the current sources in the article (the links that are under References) - Kingpin13 (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)