User talk:Tcarisland

June 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Abelian group, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 20:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 20:12, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Object-oriented programming. Categories must be directly supported by the article's verifiable content. Toddst1 (talk) 20:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there some part of this that is unclear? You need to self-revert. Toddst1 (talk) 20:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand the concept of edit warring, outlined at Wikipedia:Edit warring. You are going about things the right way, in that you are leaving edit summaries and discussing things on the talk page, but, you also need to exercise patience. You won't be able to make your edit stick through sheer repetition in the article. If you can achieve consensus on the talk page, it may take a week or more. A series of blocks from edit warring is likely to take a lot longer, and in the meantime, you won't be able to make other improvements. Willondon (talk) 22:20, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Søderberg Electrode (July 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Søderberg Electrode and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 22:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Tcarisland, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 22:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Søderberg Electrode[edit]

Hello, Tcarisland. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Søderberg Electrode".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 09:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]